• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

always on?

TrevorOfDoom

Supporting Member
Jun 17, 2007
5,571
3,196
Austin, TX
www.trevorsoetaert.com
for those with an "Always On" dirt pedal, such as the VTBass or EBS ValveDrive, have you ever tried it in your effects loop? seems a more natural way to run it, making it a "more permanent" part of your amp and your sound.
thoughts? comments?

(JimmyM, i want to hear from you. tell me you've tried this with your VTBass and LMII)
 
As I post what I did, I've experimented with having my pedals in different signal locations. The only one that gave me a sound that wasn't gross was the Bassballs in the effects loop. Mixed about 50% gave me a pretty sweet sound. That was before I knew how to adjust the trimpots. Now I get a similar sound in the normal signal location.
 
for those with an "Always On" dirt pedal, such as the VTBass or EBS ValveDrive, have you ever tried it in your effects loop? seems a more natural way to run it, making it a "more permanent" part of your amp and your sound.
thoughts? comments?

(JimmyM, i want to hear from you. tell me you've tried this with your VTBass and LMII)
Sorry Trev, I have not. I dislike effects loops immensely. Either they make no difference at all or they make a difference for the worse. All IMHO, of course, but the few times I've used a loop, I hated it.
 
The effects loop is largely designed for rack mounted effects, as doesn't run instrument level signals through the pedals. This usually ends in a sound very different from running Bass > Pedals > Amp.

To be clear Im not disputing you here at all, I am truly ignorant.

What is the difference between running through your amps effect loop and running bass>pedals>amp?