• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Am I missing something about Fenders?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I did a Google Book search on "Fender+Allure" and got a lot of interesting articles - Rolling Stone, The Stratocaster Chronicles by Tom Wheeler page 121 especially referencing Tom Murphy's articles on"Celebrating 50 Years Of The Fender Strat, and more articles and postings on just that same Fender Mystique, all having much to do with the image as a marketable icon.
ibid: "The Strat is now exalted extremely as a cultural icon. Rolling Stone went so far as to include it in the May/2003 "American Icons" cover story, along with Elvis Presley, The American flag, the Corvette and 'blonde bombshells' " yadda, yadda......

Tom Murphy developed his ability to make a repaired and/or restored guitar 'look right' by using aging techniques. Fender had introduced it's aged relics series in 1995 after Keith Richards complained that some relics made for him by the company's Custom Shop for a Stones tour would look better if, as the guitarist put it, they 'bashed them up a bit'.

Other references:

Can't Buy Me Love: The Beatles, Britain, and America
By Jonathan Gould


[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Editorial Review - Cahners Business Information (c) 2000
Bacon may be the most prolific author of guitar books; his works include The Ultimate Guitar Book, The Bass Book, The Classical Guitar, The Gibson Les Paul Book, The Gretsch Book, and many others. Here, he offers perhaps the most comprehensive tome about the electric guitar ever. While investigating the ax's iconic status, he covers 129 makers worldwide from Alembic to Zemaitis and details their successes and failures in 1200 color photographs. Spanning 1935 to 2000, this is a large book, both in page count and dimension, and is printed and bound in a quality manner. Finally, it is priced to offer excellent value.

It's (Fender's) the de facto standard. Our culture calls it the most popular electric guitar ever made. When people think of an electric guitar they think of that shape.
David Riddle: of NBT: maker of lithographic guitar illustrations



I read a great deal of the excerpts to these cited books - and more unposted - and I consistently find the true marketing and ultimately the most prevalent allure, bar none, is the "Iconic-Conditioning" of the (primarily) US market, followed closely by Japan and Britain and then the (get this!) former Soviet-Block nations!
 
Furthermore, you obviously don't like passive Fender basses, so you seem to only be able to imagine that people are playing them for some image or status reason.

Go back and read my last post. I'm not going to bore the rest of the forum by cutting and pasting the many passages where I said that there are multiple reasons why people make product selections, and that in the case of basses, sound and playability are important ones... just not the only ones, and the other reasons are of interest to me.

But if you read slowly and carefully, you will find that's exactly what I said.
 
But if you read slowly and carefully, you will find that's exactly what I said.

I've tried to remain respectful to you throughout my posts, but you are obviously incapible of doing the same. I'm done with this -- the posts speak for themselves.


btw, for the poster above, Tom Wheeler is not an academic authority on sociological behavior, and neither are any of the other "sources" you cited. I just got through watching a video with Bobby Vega wherein he stated that he prefers the ways passive Fenders sound compared to active basses which he said are too "in your face." So that is going to be my source!
 
I've tried to remain respectful to you throughout my posts, but you are obviously incapible of doing the same. I'm done with this -- the posts speak for themselves.


btw, for the poster above, Tom Wheeler is not an academic authority, and neither are any of the other "sources" you cited. I just got through watching a video with Bobby Vega wherein he stated that he prefers the ways passive Fenders sound compared to active basses which he said are too "in your face." So that is going to be my source!

You're right of course. Everybody else is wrong.

I apologize for pointing out the articles to you. It won't happen again.
 
I've tried to remain respectful to you throughout my posts, but you are obviously incapible of doing the same. I'm done with this -- the posts speak for themselves.

I heartily encourage all TBers to read our exchange in this thread. I have never been anything but respectful, even as I have had to repeatedly correct instances where you have put words in my mouth.

I believe that mutual repspect was abandoned early on by you, when you dismissed my thoughtful post as "amateur sociological internet babble." This you posited as a "fact," over against my "opinions," which you shrugged off from the outset as worthless.

Anyway, I posted a poll. We'll see what Fender players besides yourself feel about their choice of instrument. I hope that will be scientific enough for you.
 
Not a problem if Fenders don't 'speak' to you, there are a lot of other great instruments out there. IMO try out as many different brands of basses that you can, then buy the brand/model that sounds best to YOU.

I'm an older geezer around here. The big name brands in basses when I started playing were Fender, Rickenbacker, and to a lesser extent, Gibson. There really wasn't much else, -other than Fender-copies.

Most of the players that influenced me were Fender players, so the Fender tone is a 'standard' to my ears. I own a few different brands of basses, yet I still play my P-Bass often. I really like the Fender Jazz, but I absolutely love the Fender Precision.
 
I've been playing for a long time and have picked up many Fender basses. I've never been impressed at all. I've played the high and low end Jazz basses and P basses only to be disappointed each time. I wonder if it's that influence or if I'm just missing something?

I feel the same way.. Ive owned MIA & MIM P Basses and Jazz basses..Always ended up selling them, and NOT missing them...Fender just does not suit me. And Im fine with that.
 
I think the reason Fender basses are great is that they blend so well and sound great with all the other instruments. It's like the instruments play for the song. On their own, they don't have the high-fidelity tone of modern basses. But, sitting in a mix, live or recorded, the Fender tone just sounds great. Even for slapping, I think the Fenders sound better. Yes, it's tougher to slap a Fender. The slap tone sounds like the Fender bass is literally getting abused. You can hear the bass in pain, which simply sounds great.
 
I think the reason Fender basses are great is that they blend so well and sound great with all the other instruments. It's like the instruments play for the song. On their own, they don't have the high-fidelity tone of modern basses. But, sitting in a mix, live or recorded, the Fender tone just sounds great.

+10,000

How many times did I get in touch with professional bands who were looking for a bass player, and everytime I replied "Fender" when they asked what bass I played, they replied "that'll work out fine".
 
Seriously, to me the P bass is just the standard from which all others came. The pickup placement indeed lends itself to "cutting through" mixes. Also the ergonomic body's curves work well for fingers, pick, standing, or sitting. They aren't too heavy or too light . It has great "space" for both hands to easily reach notes. You can just grab notes on the fly and it's quite easy to not stare down the neck while playing. You can do giant slides and bends also without banging into extra metal, guards, pickup rings, etc. Of course you can add/mod them easily as well.

When I began playing I started with a P clone. Immediately I wanted my own bass, so I tried Carvin, Ric, BC Rich, Destroyer, etc. Every time I came back to my clones or a real P. I finally just gave in and I don't care how many exist.
 
I have always owned Fenders or F-copies.

I was shopping for a new bass recently and played lots and lots of choices--Sadowsky, Nash, MTD, Fender, Gibson, Fender Custom Shop, G&L, EBMM, new and used, 4 and 5 strings, and I am sure I am leaving out a few. Of all of them, the best "feel" I got was from a lightly used fiver Custom Shop jazz bass, regardless of price. But, considering the price, any American Fender is a pretty good deal. I have finally settled on a new AmStd jazz 4 string.

If you are a jazz or gospel player and want to solo on 6 or 7 strings, then a Fender is not for you. I am an older guy and love Southern Rock/Blues/Blues Rock, and most of the great recordings in this arena were/are made with a Fender. The sound just fits.

But, the good news is there are lots of basses out there, and you can fit them to your needs. But, lots of recording has been done with a Fender, they are a trademark sound, and they work!
 
One, I think it's hard to put Fender basses into a singular catagory because there are so many variations in tone, feel look just among jazz basses.

Two, I find that it all comes back to the near perfect design elements of the j and p bass, even though there is much improvement in components, electronics, whatever the origin is almost primal or foundational. Like when we think of a house we think of a squarish building, even though it's maybe not the best design for all occasions it's the aesthetic starting point, and I think fender basses are too.

I heard a review of a Paul McCartney album where they noted the Radiohead influences, but of course there would be not Radiohead without the Beatles. I think jazz basses are kind of like that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.