It's the only reason I don't have a V4B head. Someone needs to tell Ampeg to build a 100 watt head in the footprint of the PF50-T.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Put feet on the side of the cab and run it on its side if the "look" bothers you.
Not dumb at all.
Sweet rig...
Perhaps only gently begging for an additional Berg.![]()
Ok so this is more of a aesthetic post than anything else I guess but....
I am looking to buy a 212 cabinet that is 18.5" wide. Head in case is 22" wide. How dumb will this look? Is there any chance that it will be too unstable on stage? Should a get some boards for support?
May be a short time problem until I can find a decent class D that has the tone I want, but I haven't found one yet.
Depends on one's POV.Ok so this is more of a aesthetic post than anything else I guess but....
I am looking to buy a 212 cabinet that is 18.5" wide. Head in case is 22" wide. How dumb will this look?
Ok so this is more of a aesthetic post than anything else I guess but....
I am looking to buy a 212 cabinet that is 18.5" wide. Head in case is 22" wide. How dumb will this look? Is there any chance that it will be too unstable on stage? Should a get some boards for support?
May be a short time problem until I can find a decent class D that has the tone I want, but I haven't found one yet.
I’ve got a 24.5” head on an 18.5” cab. Looks dumb. I don’t care.I look even dumber.
View attachment 3686062
Definitely, a latest thing kind of thing. The two that I posted were made in the 1910s.This was built near where I live recently. Apparently hanging over is now the latest thing:
View attachment 3686527

What is maple edge tape?