• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ampeg PF-500, pf-115HE vs 410

J

Jdog568404

Oct 14, 2010
109
3
#1
Ok, so .... I am in need of a new amp (obviously Ampeg is a likely choice). Affordability is nice, which is what the PF-500 is, with plenty of power. My question to the community is how loud is the 115HE compared to a regular ampeg 410? And what's the difference? Do you sacrifice tone and loudness for less weight? Please tell me a lot about each and I'd like it if you've had experience and/or played around with each. I'm still only a semi-pro bassist who needs advice! Thanks guys :)
 
#2
You don't sacrifice tone at all with the PF115he, but you do lose some volume compared to a 410. A 115 is more comparable to a 210 in output.

I own two PF115he's, and I've played Ampeg 410's numerous times on gigs over the years. So Ampeg has two main 410's, a 410he and a 410hlf. The 410he is a sealed cab tuned more like the 810e, with a low end that's not subsonic or anything but works very well in a mix to keep from sounding muddy. The 410hlf goes insanely low, one of the lowest going cabs on the market. Some players love that low end, but I'm more into the low end of the 410he. Personal preference...just what I grew up with and recognize as good bass tone. The PF115he has a low end that's voiced between the two different 410's. Not too low...not too high.
 
#3
Alright ... Sounds like I am taking a trip to GC to find my preference out! But you own 2 115s and they are loud enough to gig with? Like you have never had trouble keeping up with the guitarists huge Marshall stack or whatever right?
 
#6
Jdog568404 said:
Alright ... Sounds like I am taking a trip to GC to find my preference out! But you own 2 115s and they are loud enough to gig with? Like you have never had trouble keeping up with the guitarists huge Marshall stack or whatever right?
Click to expand...
I don't play in bands where I have to worry about it, quite honestly, but considering its output is about the same as a 410, I'd say two PF115's would do as well as a 410 in keeping up.
 
#10
SubSectorSucker said:
Yep.. Provided that both 410s were 8ohms
Click to expand...

Why would they need to be 8 ohms? Im a rookie on omhs and watts I know generally the more watts the loud, usually? But correct me if I'm wrong. Also, I currently have a acoustic B100 which is 100W at 4 omhs. So could I hook the pf-500 with its 115He and then link the HE to my 100W combo and use it as a cab as well or what?
 
#11
Jdog568404 said:
Why would they need to be 8 ohms? Im a rookie on omhs and watts I know generally the more watts the loud, usually? But correct me if I'm wrong. Also, I currently have a acoustic B100 which is 100W at 4 omhs. So could I hook the pf-500 with its 115He and then link the HE to my 100W combo and use it as a cab as well or what?
Click to expand...

The louder,*
 
#13
In order to use two cabinets, their combined impedance needs to be greater than or equal to the minimum impedance rating of the cabinet. When combining cabs, use this formula: ZT = (Z1Z2)/(Z1 + Z2) Where impedance = Z, and the numbers are the various cabs, and T is the total. Thus, with two 8 ohm cabs: (8*8)/(8+8)=(64)/(16)=4 ohms.

Jdog568404 said:
So 2 115HEs would be good enough for gigs?
Click to expand...

Absolutely! Especially since (generally) the cabs are only for stage reference anyway, and the main sound goes out the DI to the FOH mains.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sleepyEDB
#14
tekdiver500ft said:
In order to use two cabinets, their combined impedance needs to be greater than or equal to the minimum impedance rating of the cabinet. When combining cabs, use this formula: ZT = (Z1Z2)/(Z1 + Z2) Where impedance = Z, and the numbers are the various cabs, and T is the total. Thus, with two 8 ohm cabs: (8*8)/(8+8)=(64)/(16)=4 ohms.


Absolutely! Especially since (generally) the cabs are only for stage reference anyway, and the main sound goes out the DI to the FOH mains.
Click to expand...

Ok so ... The pf-500 is 500W at 4 omhs .. The 115HE is 450W at 8 omhs and my acoustic combo is 100W at 4 omhs .. Would this check out? (8*4)/(8+4) = 2.6667 about .. Is that right? I'm still a little confused (never taken physics)

Ok that's great! Ill prolly just start with buying 1 portaflex 500 with 115 and then go from there.
 
#15
tekdiver500ft said:
In order to use two cabinets, their combined impedance needs to be greater than or equal to the minimum impedance rating of the cabinet. When combining cabs, use this formula: ZT = (Z1Z2)/(Z1 + Z2) Where impedance = Z, and the numbers are the various cabs, and T is the total. Thus, with two 8 ohm cabs: (8*8)/(8+8)=(64)/(16)=4 ohms.
Click to expand...


well that's looks very mathmatical. :smug:

But for stupid people like me who can barely do arithmetic the Ampeg PF500 will only take a minimum load of 4 ohms and no lower than that. That means you can use 1 - 4ohm cabinet (many 410's are wired this way, very few 15's or 210's). OR....you could use 2 - 8ohm cabs (many 410's, 115's, 210's & 112's).

I like the 2 8ohm cab option as I can bring one cab for smaller gigs and 2 cabs for the bigger ones.

And 2 PF115's would be stellar for all but the biggest stadiums.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sleepyEDB
#18
bassguppy said:
well that's looks very mathmatical. :smug:

But for stupid people like me who can barely do arithmetic the Ampeg PF500 will only take a minimum load of 4 ohms and no lower than that. That means you can use 1 - 4ohm cabinet (many 410's are wired this way, very few 15's or 210's). OR....you could use 2 - 8ohm cabs (many 410's, 115's, 210's & 112's).

I like the 2 8ohm cab option as I can bring one cab for smaller gigs and 2 cabs for the bigger ones.

And 2 PF115's would be stellar for all but the biggest stadiums.
Click to expand...

I got the PF500 and the PF115 for xmas.

I want to get another cab. Do you recommend the 210 or just get another 115?
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back