• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ampeg PF-800: First Impressions

My PF is dead silent, so I think the induced noise from my pups would outstrip any sound that the fan would make.
If I was recording with enough output to get the speaker to produce a full tone, the fan on high would be better than 40dB below the speaker output with the microphone 1m from the cab.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rodslinger
Fan noise on a PF-800???? Not mine. There is no noticeable noise when playing live. I have had plenty of amps that had noticeable fan noise, which, by the way, is not a concern for me when I'm playing live anyway. When I'm in a real recording studio (not someone's basement "studio"), I'm using the studio's gear, not my PF-800. These days, real studio recording is almost all through a preamp and then direct-to-disk, with a real amp or an amp simulator added during mix-down.
 
I pulled the trigger on a PF-800 - Not like I need more equipment but when I had a PF-500 I kept getting the feeling that if it had a couple more watts of power it would be much cleaner at a higher level (And Possibly Not Cut Out), and it sounds like this is what your getting with the PF-800.

Thanks,:bassist:
 
I don't know if you have noticed but I have actually lessened my warnings regarding the pf series, particularly the problematic 500 as the 10th revision seems to be doing the trick, so far.
 
Having had them both, I'd say that they are more comparable than not, the only real difference is in the voicing.

Differences: The STM is much more bottom heavy, louder, and more pristine. The PF is Ampeg through and through. It has more natural grit and darkness, less scoop in the low-mids, and a little less treble.