Speaking of VT Bass/Little Mark, I went back to this config while waiting for my replacement PF500. Now I'm wondering why I thought I needed the PF500 at all! Wicked gas I guess.
Anyway, I set up the LMII just like I would the PF (set the gain to just below clipping and master volume to taste) and I barely have the volume at 9 o'clock, whereas on the PF500, I would have to set my gain and master volume to at LEAST 2 o'clock to get anywhere near the volume of the Little Mark. And at those settings the PF500 would be very overdriven.
Could this be a sign that my PF is in fact broken, or is that all the juice these amps can put out? 'Cause if it is, then the Little Mark BLOWS the Ampeg out of the water in terms of volume.
Is anyone else able to make this comparison?
Anyway, I set up the LMII just like I would the PF (set the gain to just below clipping and master volume to taste) and I barely have the volume at 9 o'clock, whereas on the PF500, I would have to set my gain and master volume to at LEAST 2 o'clock to get anywhere near the volume of the Little Mark. And at those settings the PF500 would be very overdriven.
Could this be a sign that my PF is in fact broken, or is that all the juice these amps can put out? 'Cause if it is, then the Little Mark BLOWS the Ampeg out of the water in terms of volume.
Is anyone else able to make this comparison?
