TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
In the interests of being thorough, I just wanted to add that I was using a 78sih Ampeg B-40 cab 4x10.
And the bass used was an Epiphone Thunderbird I do have an Explorer but I had the Thunderbird on this gig. My frustration with the experience musta confused me!
G.C. gave me the return no worries; the sales fellow did mention that someone just brought back the 350 with the same issue. Maybe that one on ebay(for more than its worth ?)is for that reason just speculating, of course.
And I will add that despite my experience nothing has changed in my appreciation, admiration and respect for all things Ampeg I actually bought the PF500 because I was getting weary of beating up my main amp, a 74 SVT; as well as beating up my back carting it around! And if another version of this amp comes out in the future I would have company faith enough to give it another go.
And to add to the thoroughness of the explanation of what happened in my case, as I mentioned I play very aggressively through the Thunderbird, digging in very hard, and the band is full tilt on 11 - from start to finish volume-wise. Dynamics is a word belonging to an alien culture with this band!
cheers

That all depends on the bass and pickup system you use, but I find the same thing when I play upright, too, so I gravitate toward less bottomy cabs for upright, too.I do really like my b100r for upright. I'm thinking the pf cab would work better with a upright bass. I could be wrong about that also. The b100r has a really controlled low end. I do use a fishman preamp set to pre just to buffer the pickup and to use the phase control on the fishman when I need to.
Well my saga continues...
I originally purchased the Ampeg PF350 Amp head and the SVT210AV. Sounded great in GC but in a small to medium church it sounded thin.
So I went back to GC and ordered the GKMB115. It sounds ok but... it isn't an Ampeg! I just overall like the Ampeg sound.
So... I am going back to GC and getting the Ampeg PF500 and the B115E, I think.
I really wanted something I could carry myself and I won't be able to carry this. I am 5'2 and female... Not a weakling but too many years in the Tae Kwon-Do ring has beaten me up.
Preference is: lightweight - but can't seem to find that.
I would have preferred a 1x12 but Ampeg doesn't make that anymore.
What are your opinions/take on this?
I just want to get what I like and move on. Some people love buying and trying new things, I don't. But I had to have a new Amp and this is where I am at.
...
So... I am going back to GC and getting the Ampeg PF500 and the B115E, I think.
...
What are your opinions/take on this?
I just want to get what I like and move on. Some people love buying and trying new things, I don't. But I had to have a new Amp and this is where I am at.
This is the very first time in history that a solid state Portaflex actually sold numbers. None of them did very well before. I guess everything coaslesced at the same time to make a solid state Portaflex work in the market...light weight, higher wattage, ability to mimic tube sounds much better, price...still haven't seen the cabs yet but the heads are killer.
...still haven't seen the cabs yet but the heads are killer.
JimmyM said:This is the very first time in history that a solid state Portaflex actually sold numbers. None of them did very well before. I guess everything coaslesced at the same time to make a solid state Portaflex work in the market...light weight, higher wattage, ability to mimic tube sounds much better, price...still haven't seen the cabs yet but the heads are killer.
They're already back ordered on online music outlets. That tells me they're selling.Are they selling well? Haven't seen sales figures so can't tell whether they're in high demand or short supply.
I've had experience with prior SS attempts. This head beats all.