• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ampeg stack just for looks?

Hey, I love SVT with the fridge. Once had a square back SVT cab that was killer. I have also heard the 410 HLF cab and liked it, a very different creature. I would love a B-15. Their new portaflex stuff with the solid state heads is something I want to listen to. I own a Mesa 400+ which BTW sounds great into an SVT fridge at war volume.
 
I think you see a lot of Ampeg rigs because a lot of major artists specify an Ampeg 8x10 rig as their required backline... so most larger sound companies have one... so artists specify them because it's easy to get and "good enough"... You see it everywhere because you see it everywhere.

One wonders why Ampeg (loud) so often flirts with bankruptcy when they are so popular. :P

[edit] Oh right, and personally I always thought (and still do think) the Ampeg heads looked frumpy. I'd never play them for the looks. If you need gear cred you play cool boutique gear!
 
For a long time, I've actually consciously steered away from Ampeg due to their reputation in the early LOUD years.

However, I ran a full-circle and eventually got to the SVT which had exactly the sound I was looking for. I still do love a lot of my other amps (SWR, Traynor, Mesa), but Ampeg is simply the best at what I want to do. It's difficult to get everything that the SVT is, out of anything other than an SVT.

That said, I'm still not very impressed with the hybrid SVTs. :(
 
"come say that to me on a gig sometime and see how quickly i have you thrown out" - I would have no reason to tell you that your rig sucks, because as I already stated: "This is the kind of polarizing issue that unfortuantley, the people who dont understand can only figure out on thier own, over time."

"BTW I used to run as many as three 8x10 rigs, back in my 20's" - really, I have owned and played alot of Ampeg gear over the years. Tried really hard to like it, but it's not for me. From what I have seen, alot of people grow out of it once the thrill of standing in front of an Ampeg stack wears off. Furthermore, I have found that the cabs are not durable, and the heads are not reliable, when compared to higher end brands such as Epifany and Markbass, even SWR if you want more of an 'apples to apples' brand comparison.

The original post said "many producers and audience alike will look for this and judge players that don't have them". Tell you what, next time you are in a studio situation with an established producer, you should deffinintly insist on playing an your Ampeg stack in the studio. Be sure to PM me to let me know how that works out.

Well, I have had my quarterly dose of Talkbass, enough to remind myself why I dont look at TB very often. I go to Panchos once a year for the same reason. See yall in April.

Hey, thanks for coming by, but! I found your arrogance refreshing and your condescension a pleasant change from the usual humdrum trading of experience and exchanging of opinion.

I now know how wrong my preferences are, and how foolishly I've been behaving up until now. If any other poor misguided bassists still persist in their folly, they can head over to the classifieds and see my FT trade post. All I want in return for my SVT, Bergie NV610 (essentially the Ampeg fridge sound) and VT pedal is a little Markbass rig.

When you come back in April, please please please check out my profile and respect me. It's very important for my self-image, as being seen on stages with the Ampeg rig was the only reason I had any self-respect until now.

What brand of sneaker do you recommend?
 
For me personally, I had been playing bass 20+ years before I was able to get an SVTCL and 810 rig. At the time I was playing in a group that always had PA support so my usual gig rig was a SVT3Pro into a 410HLF cabinet. The stack sat in the music room for 5 years ands was taken out exactly 7 times. I liked the sound. Call me lazy, but it was beast to load and move around. I eventually traded it for a MM SR4HH. Now, I'm in a different group with no PA support, but playing smaller venues and have headed the other direction with a newly aquired GK MB115 on an amp stand. I got numerous complements at the last practice over how much better the bass sounded. Clean, articulate, warm etc, etc. and that's over a B100R that I usually use!

I have a gig this Friday and I can't wait to get the GK on stage!

I'm for going with the minimal rig that will get the job done with adequate headroom. Most of those audience members oohing and aahing over your rig won't be around for the load-out at 2AM...!:) When I see a band, I do take note of the bassists rig and instruments, but always reserve judgement and most of the impression is taken from the tone, mix and musicality of the player...

To each, his/her own I say....
 
I think you see a lot of Ampeg rigs because a lot of major artists specify an Ampeg 8x10 rig as their required backline... so most larger sound companies have one... so artists specify them because it's easy to get and "good enough"... You see it everywhere because you see it everywhere.

True, Marshall halfstacks and Ampeg SVT+fridge are the standard for backline for a lot of shows I have worked on. Esp when its a shared backline among several acts. Always funy to see guys scramble to get "their" sound on those rigs if they arent familiar.
(actually more of an issue on Marshalls IMHO).
 
Speaks for itself.
2011-01-14173808.jpg
 
I think you see a lot of Ampeg rigs because a lot of major artists specify an Ampeg 8x10 rig as their required backline... so most larger sound companies have one... so artists specify them because it's easy to get and "good enough"... You see it everywhere because you see it everywhere.

One wonders why Ampeg (loud) so often flirts with bankruptcy when they are so popular. :P
had to edit off your silly "frumpy" comment ;) but ampeg's history is rife with bankruptcy flirting and owners who didn't know best how to capitalize on what they had. read the ampeg book sometime...it'll curl your hair!
 
Gee, I play an Ampeg stack just for looks. You can't see the logo or even tell it's a bass rig, though. It's got checkered grillcloth, and sideways it creates a nice symmetry with my guitarist's side-by-side half stacks with checkered grillcloth. The only reason I don't use a dummy rig is that my drummer likes to feel whump from the bass.

It makes a fine stage monitor, and a nice backdrop. The audience definitely notices when you have something neat to look at, and when you just don't care how you look. Those Ampeg stacks are part of what non-musicians associate with music, and it's hard to go wrong with one for a stage image. If they get your sound, too, well awesome. But mine's mainly just for looks :)
 
Ok we know that the ampeg stack with either a vintage svt head or the newer svt-vr will provide a good sound. But, i can't help but think that many producers and audience alike will look for this and judge players that don't have them. I know most people will like what they hear and go out and buy the gear that suites them but im thinking that the ampeg stack might be more of a stage prop than actual amplification. Im sure bergantino and epifani and the like will eventually become more recognized by the public and producers/engineers but it seems like every time i go see a band i like that i've never seen before they always have the ubiquitous ampeg stack. Whats with that?

I think 99% of the world's population could give a rat's behind about what kind of amp you play. Occasionally you'll run into "THAT" band where you have to play a Fender P-bass through an Ampeg OR ELSE!!! But I stear clear of these folks, they usually don't shower very often and have rotting teeth (how else would they get chicks besides being in a band?).