TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Oh I do think digital loopers are better. I just like the idea of analog. The purity of the flow of energy,sure it evolves as it goes through the chain ,but the energy I put in is the energy that comes out of the speakers. Its not transferred into 1 and 0's .There's nothing wrong with digital. But I'm sold on the idea of an analog signal path.
Also, and I say this as a fan of analog and a fan of the ZVex unit... it's still just 1's and 0's.
Analog delay is done with bucket-brigade chips, which get their name because they store a voltage level in a memory location for a short period of time, then hand it off to the next memory location, which again holds it and then passes it along. It's squarely in a grey area between analog and digital, where analog voltages are processed using devices that are technically digital, even though the audio signal is not converted into data per se.
So in the case of looping (done with analog delay chips), the philosophical thing totally breaks down and falls apart.
Now, if you ask me about any other type of effect, I might fall more into the analog-worshipping voodoo camp.![]()