• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ancient Technology Enthusiasts Club!

OK, with the semester over, I'm going to rant about a different kind of tech; medical tech, specifically, trepanation (also spelling "trephination" and various other ways). This is surgery that removes bone from the skull.
ancientcrani.jpg


We have neolithic examples - thousands of them, actually. The reason I'm calling this a "rant" is because I just finished teaching a course on the history of mental illness, and lots of my students got from the internet that ancient peoples trepanned mentally ill people because they believed they were possessed by evil spirits and cutting a hole in the skull would let the spirits out.

There's one slight problem with this interpretation: there's precisely zero evidence for it.

No ancient source says anything of the kind. In fact, the ancient Egyptians (who did a lot of trepanning) didn't even associate the brain with mental illness (or mental anything) at all; they thought these functions happened in the heart. When ancients do talk about trepanation, it's normally for one of two purposes; either the patient had suffered a head injury and the physician was removing fractured bone so that you wouldn't have sharp splinters poking around the brain; or they were suffering pain from brain swelling and the trepanation was to ease the pressure.

Later Greek and Roman physicians did figure out that the brain was the seat of mental function, and there are a couple of rare references to using trepanation for mental illness or epilepsy. In those cases, though, it wasn't thought of as a way to release supernatural forces from the head, but humors, according to the prevailing science of the day.

So where does the interpretation that trepanation was a solution for spirit possession come from? I only know of one source; the writings of Usama ibn Munqidh, a 12th century Syrian nobleman in the age of Crusades. He tells a story of a Middle Eastern Christian physician named Thabit, who was hired to work in a crusader lord's household. Then a "Frankish" (European) physician arrived and took over his patients. One of them, a woman suffering "idiocy" (probably what we today would call severely learning-disabled or autistic), the newcomer proclaimed to be demon-possessed and carved a cross into her scalp, down to the bone, in order to let it out. But she just died instead. Thabit returned to ibn Munqidh's household, complaining about his incompetent foreign rival.

The story is constantly repeated in history books about the era, but it's also suspect; Ibn Munqidh has it at second hand, and his informant is a person with an axe to grind because he lost his job to the foreigner. But it's so vivid and it plays beautifully into our modern stereotypes about past "dark ages" awash with superstition and cruelty that we constantly rehash it and let it become a trope, that ancient peoples liked to drill holes in each others' skulls to let demons out.

I used to think that ibn Munqidh was doubly suspect because I had never seen anything like the Frankish physician's procedure described in any western medical treatise of the time. But double-checking in preparation for this post, I cam across this quote:

"Another use of trephining was as a treatment for mental disease. In his “Practica Chirurgiae,” Roger of Parma (ca. 1170) wrote:

"For mania or melancholy a cruciate incision is made in the top of the head and the cranium is penetrated, to permit the noxious material to exhale to the outside. The patient is held in chains and the wound is treated, as above, under treatment of wounds."

1170 is right about the same time that ibn Munqidh was writing. So it's possible that Thabit's rival was attempting the same procedure Roger of Parma was advocating, and Thabit misrepresented it as supernatural rather than medical in character.
 

Is a chapter a technology? Chapter and verse, maybe it's true — turning the page on another of history's techno-happenstances. "The Gospels were originally written without chapters … " — 'Why do novels have chapters?': A simple question with a 2,000-year-old answer.

For much of human history, texts were not divided into sections. They were words upon words upon words. The earliest chaptered text … was a Roman legal tablet from Urbino, dating back to the second century BCE.

The tablet was announcing a new law, explains Professor Dames, who's written the book
The Chapter: A Segmented History from Antiquity to the 21st Century. …

Over much of its history, chaptering was not the responsibility of writers, but of editors. This was called "capitulation".

"It was an ancient technique, and that extends well into medieval Europe, for taking a text that you have not written, a text that pre-exists you and …. dividing it in a way that makes sense," Professor Dames explains.

"It was an intellectual labour that was performed by scholars, particularly within the Roman Empire [and also] by medieval monks. It was a very, very long-lasting form of intellectual labour."

Depending on the individual editor, a book could be divided up in countless different ways.
I ascribe, this is a real page turner. The book would be a good read. Listen in here, if you like — The evolution of the chapter - ABC listen





 
Last edited:

No?

But the book, made through mechanical processes, engineered as an appliance for leisure and instruction, can also be seen as a machine, a tool for use, a technology developed to serve a need, and one with a long and rich history.
The Book as Technology
The others follow suit:) Rivers have always carried, transported, technologies becoming, as a consequence, an intrinsic aspect of all of it — the parade, the trade and all the trappings. Food and nutrition have fueled countless formulations and fabrications driving and improving, among other things, farming technologies, some as old as the hills.

One could not exist without the other. I may be wrong.​
 
Last edited:

Actually, I'd say yes, at least in some senses. There's a narrow sense of "technology" as "machinery," but a broader sense as "human methods of controlling their environment." (EDIT: the Greek "techne" means "skill," and as many know, "-ology" is from "logos," literally meaning "word" but also "idea, concept, knowledge." So "technology" is the knowledge of a skill, i.e. knowing how to make a thing happen, with tools or otherwise). Animal domestication, for instance, is considered a technology in that latter sense. Of the ones @Tom Bomb listed,

1) Fire itself is not a technology, but means of making it and controlling it to cook food certainly is.
2) a river is not a technology, but means of rerouting one is.
3) books are absolutely a technology - tools for recording speech, one of the oldest forms of information tech besides cave paintings - and various methods of organizing them and making their information more accessible to readers are components of that tech.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Bomb
Is a sewage system a technology? And when we incorporate rivers for this purpose, which we all too often do? Then there's the Pelton wheel. Water water everywhere … IDK:)

I'd say the Cloaca Maxima was one of the Roman's more impressive engineering achievements.

And going back, I'd agree that chaptering is a technological advancement, making any kind of reference material much more useable. The teaching and application of the Bible would have been tedious to say the least without chapter and verse to reference. Although it could also be said that this invited cherry picking of verses with little regard to context.
 

It follows:) From the river to the Caesar. … What have the Romans ever done for us? Sanitation? Very nice:)

Going with the flow, it's interesting to note that not only were there no chapters initially, there was no separation between words either. And yet people could still comfortably gain concrete meaning from this morass of musings. It follows, I'd say, that we ourselves are a major part of this technology. It doesn't stop there. We have a lot to answer for:)
 

Chimps are aping healers, or is it the other way 'round?

… a team of researchers combined behavioral observations of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) with pharmacological testing of the potentially medicinal plants they eat. They monitored the behavior and health of 51 chimpanzees from two communities in the Budongo Central Forest Reserve in Uganda, who were habituated to the presence of humans. Next, they collected plant extracts from 13 species of trees and herbs in the reserve that they suspected the chimpanzees might be using to self-medicate. These included plants that they observed sick or injured chimpanzees eating, but were not part of their normal diet, and plants that previous research has suggested chimpanzees might consume for their medicinal properties.

The extracts were then tested for their anti-inflammatory and antibiotic properties at Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences, led by Dr Fabien Schultz.

The researchers found that 88% of the plant extracts inhibited bacterial growth, while 33% had anti-inflammatory properties. Dead wood from a tree in the Dogbane family (Alstonia boonei) showed the strongest antibacterial activity and also had anti-inflammatory properties, suggesting that the chimpanzees may consume it to treat wounds. Interestingly, Alstonia boonei is also used as a medicinal plant in East African communities to treat a variety of conditions, including bacterial infections, gastro-intestinal issues, snake bites, and asthma.

Bark and resin from the East African mahogany tree (Khaya anthotheca) and leaves from a fern (Christella parasitica) exhibited potent anti-inflammatory effects. The researchers observed a male Chimpanzee with an injured hand seek out and eat leaves of the fern, which may have helped to reduce pain and swelling. They also recorded an individual with a parasitic infection consuming bark of the cat-thorn tree (Scutia myrtina), which the chimpanzees in this group had never been observed to eat before. Testing revealed that this bark had both anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties.

The results provide compelling evidence that chimpanzees seek out specific plants for their medicinal effects. The study is the most in-depth analysis to date that combines both behavioral and pharmacological evidence of the medicinal benefits to wild chimpanzees of feeding on bark and dead wood.
https://www.anthro.ox.ac.uk/article...t-medicinal-plants-treat-illness-and-injuries

Monkey see, monkey do, I do declare. (Mahogany gets a look in — lapping that up, for obvious reasons:))

Sky-high tech. parrots old school. If it flies, why not?



 

fc1ba740e7d42e71590dbb4b5aa5bf2b.jpg

The “bullroarer” is a simple instrument that has been developed in several different environments, ranging from the Inuit of Canada and inhabitants of ancient Egypt in about 3,000 BC to the Aboriginal inhabitants of Australia, who may have used it for far longer.
AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS — THE BULLROARER (PDF)





As kids, we used to make, and play these mesmerizing musical instruments. Hope we didn't upset the balance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fig