songwriter21
I have an obsession for wood. The musical kind.
The history of Boner...um...I mean Bono (the really juicy gossip is at :47):
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Rhonda can also get whatever, I would think. If you were good enough to play for Prince, well....
I'm kinda there with you. Was a huge fan until Rattle and Hum. After all these years, I'm still a listener of everything up to that point, though. I paid for the Joshua Tree reunion tour, more for nostalgia than anything else, and don't regret it. But they really didn't sound that great.
To be honest, what live footage I've seen of them since the 90s, and the the show I went to last summer, both Adam Clayton and Larry Mullen, Jr. look like they are just calling it in. Given the amount of time these guys have played live together, with a huge chunk of that time spent being outrageously famous, I don't expect them to be overly excited every show. But sheesh, they look they could be playing in their sleep. I guess that doesn't say much about the complexity of their parts LOL. I can't really disagree with the argument that he hasn't really stretched himself. At the same time, he has made an insane amount of money doing it. Why change the formula? I've read interviews with the Malcom brothers where they are very clear about how hard they worked to keep AC/DC "the same". But I see far less vitriol for AC/DC here than I do for U2.
I don't get the hate. They aren't virtuosos. But their sound and groove together was unmistakable. I will still listen to Adam Clayton and enjoy his licks and vamps far more than any solo bass virtuoso. I may be in the minority here, but I think Adam Clayton and Jarry Mullen Jr. are one of the greatest rhythm sections in mainstream rock history. I fully accept that it is a matter of opinion, and that I am not a critic. Simple, rock solid, and tight. Just right for their songs. Just enough unique fills to make things interesting, and nothing more. And that's what I like to play and listen to.
Here's some examples of very different styles of U2 basslines throughout their career which don't suck. (IMO)
I don’t get the hate either. I have one of their older CD’s kicking around somewhere but they’re far from my favourite band. Sure Bono has become some sort of a d-bag and egos have gotten high, but I don’t begrudge them any of their success.
I wouldn’t mind one of the Clayton jazz basses but I’m not really a fan of Sherwood green. It’s cool to see the old lollipop tuners being made again though.
Not disagreeing at all with the point you make, but MM was saying pretty similar when he he was on at UK Bass Day in Manchester (looked up the date and it was 2011I remember reading an interview with Marcus Miller and he said that the first thing he did when he received his basses from Fender was to send them out and have the preamp changed. So people were buying the Marcus Miller signature bass and it wasn't even what he was using. This is typical of signature basses.
, where's my life gone?). Someone in the crowd hoofed their Sig up towards the stage and there was a lot of "come on, stand by your product" banter. He swapped basses and, apart from a mumble-grumble about how old the strings were, played on with that. I know he couldn't do much else, but he wasn't arsey about it and he didn't sound much different (to me, which is saying nothing. I got pulled over for playing a bass while in charge of a vehicle. When they heard my chops, even my licence didn't get an endorsement.)...and we'd be obligated to make him a custom bass; The Adam Clayton "Talk Bass".Adam Clayton gets trash talked so regularly here he could practically set his watches by it.
I got a Marcus Miller jazz and a Tony Franklin Precision. I never expected to sound like MM and to this day I have not (consciously) listened to any song with Tony Franklin.
In both cases these were the best basses I could afford at that point, and both gave me exactly what I was looking for in terms of specs. Both are better than other "regular" basses I have (had/tried).
If I was in the market for another bass (and let's face it, who isn't?) and an Adam Clayton sig would be the best pick of the bunch, I'd go with that one.
The level of stupidity and short-sightedness of some of these responses is staggering, to be honest. Oh and don't hate Adam Clayton for being rich. Hate yourself for not landing as good a gig as he did
Who knows how any of us would turn out if we had people constantly praising us and patting us on the back for 30 years?. You probably end up believing you can walk on water.Sometimes I wonder if Bono just comes across badly, or if sometimes his stage act leaks out. No idea, as I don't know the guy personally. I saw U2 a couple of times in the heyday (90s), so I definitely don't hate U2, but it's an easy target for comedy.
Does it matter?Oh and by the way, if you think Adam Clayton's bass playing begins and ends with plodding driving 8th note lines try listening to some more U2 songs.
Does it matter?
Well, I'm an advocate for people not being ignorant.
So in a way it does matter. To me at least.
I’m surprised how many people on his forum would turn down their own signature model if given the opportunity.
...and we'd be obligated to make him a custom bass; The Adam Clayton "Talk Bass".
They're just "tribute" guitars and hardly anything like the real thing anyway. At first Fender couldn't even bother getting the right dot spacing at the 12th fret for any pre-cbs tribute guitars. Today I think they are just asking the artist to think up a bass they would like. Then Fender will sell it as their sig guitar/bass for no more than a tour. There's businesses out there that are taking a 59 RI, deconstructing it and rebuilding like Gibson should have for about 10K.I would absolutely turn it down....I think the idea of sig models is stupid.

Might have to agree with you there. Phil's basses were always flashy but I don't recall anything like that.So I fent...Had this in my cart at Reverb for the past week while I mulled it over...I don't even like U2, and the color purple isn't even something I like, but damn this is a sweet looking bass, and than this morning I look and they are 15% off (wilcutt guitars), which will lessen the pain if I later on decide its not something that works for me. Im not even sure if I'll be able to play it out...Bringing a purple sparkely bass out with the Grateful Dead cover band Im in might be frowned upon by the Hippies
View attachment 2874134
Might have to agree with you there. Phil's basses were always flashy but I don't recall anything like that.
Yep it would be.Bringing a purple sparkely bass out with the Grateful Dead cover band Im in might be frowned upon by the Hippies
It's not a multimillionaire from some say it is a band, others say it is a multinational corporation or hedge fund, who takes every more dollar he can find to market his 5th or so signature bass.
But I still in general don't like this signature-thing or players, who prostitute themselves to as many corporations as possible. Maybe if it is a very small company and they have very good stuff and a famous player wants to support them a bit...
So I fent...Had this in my cart at Reverb for the past week while I mulled it over...I don't even like U2, and the color purple isn't even something I like, but damn this is a sweet looking bass, and than this morning I look and they are 15% off (wilcutt guitars), which will lessen the pain if I later on decide its not something that works for me. Im not even sure if I'll be able to play it out...Bringing a purple sparkely bass out with the Grateful Dead cover band Im in might be frowned upon by the Hippies
View attachment 2874134
