TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
..."was billed as, and it was, a "Jazz Jam"."I played a performance Sunday afternoon where we played to entertain ourselves. It was billed as, and it was, a "Jazz Jam". We played old standards out of the Real Book. We all had a great time. I met some nice guys. We had an audience of three.
That was cool.
...maybe, ... it's not us. Maybe bars here are just struggling.
It wasn't a problem: we didn't expect a large audience, we didn't expect to earn any money, and we weren't disappointed.
Well, you COULD make "take ten" actually MEAN ten, not "We're going to take a ten minute break for twenty minutes and be back in half an hour".
The mood on a dance floor will change minute by minute. When everyone's up and dancing and having a great time, that is the WORST time to finish off the set with a 8 minute wank fest rumpty-rumpty 12 bar blues death march and then take a 45 minute break.
I was in a reggae band and we would play straight through until the dancers would tire out then take a break. Because once we went on break, it could take a few minutes to get backWell, you COULD make "take ten" actually MEAN ten, not "We're going to take a ten minute break for twenty minutes and be back in half an hour".
The mood on a dance floor will change minute by minute. When everyone's up and dancing and having a great time, that is the WORST time to finish off the set with a 8 minute wank fest rumpty-rumpty 12 bar blues death march and then take a 45 minute break.
These should be rules:
1. If they are dancing, band ain't breaking.
2. If they are dancing, next song - needs to be a dance tune.
It wasn't a problem: we didn't expect a large audience, we didn't expect to earn any money, and we weren't disappointed.
My point is that you can actually have a satisfying musical life, playing what you want when you want, just don't expect to make money doing it.
What if they aren't dancing?Truth.
These should be rules:
1. If they are dancing, band ain't breaking.
2. If they are dancing, next song - needs to be a dance tune. Rinse and repeat.
Period.
What if they aren't dancing?
And as an original band, you actually spend money for the honor of playing to a dozen people
But again the point, MY point is, WHY are we losing the crowd that we DO have? Not drawing a crowd is one thing but not being able to hold the crowd that you get is another. My point has been, if you're read any of my threads here, that we're doing too much I-IV-V blues based music with too many guitar solos, and frankly, now that I think about it, just too much of the BL. The BL is good but I think he believes his own publicity and thinks he's all that and I don't think the listeners feel the same way. In a typical night I might sing two songs, the lead guitarist one or two. All of the other songs are sung by the BL. At the gig discussed above in two sets I didn't' sing any songs, and I don't know that I would have in a third set either.
Yes. Freeform jazz at an Air Force base.Where in the US are you, again?
Was this another "Jazz Jam?"
It happened again. We played last weekend at a venue that's become a regular spot for us. It was a new spot the first time we played there and we had a good crowd. The place is no longer new and I think the crowd has just naturally dwindled as most places do. Anyway we played Dec. 22nd which I expected to be slow, being so close to Christmas, and it was. Very slim crowd when we started pllaying.
The band leader had decided to play 3 piece, because of our lead guitar players heart surgery, instead of getting another piece, for the extra money. And we played okay. That BL actually played some things on guitar that I had never heard him play and really didn't think he could play. So that part was allright. Despite that, by the end of the second set there was nobody there. When we were getting ready to go back for the third set the bar manager asked us if we wanted to check out early. The BL said "yeah, there's no sense in playing to nobody."
But again the point, MY point is, WHY are we losing the crowd that we DO have? Not drawing a crowd is one thing but not being able to hold the crowd that you get is another. My point has been, if you're read any of my threads here, that we're doing too much I-IV-V blues based music with too many guitar solos, and frankly, now that I think about it, just too much of the BL. The BL is good but I think he believes his own publicity and thinks he's all that and I don't think the listeners feel the same way. In a typical night I might sing two songs, the lead guitarist one or two. All of the other songs are sung by the BL. At the gig discussed above in two sets I didn't' sing any songs, and I don't know that I would have in a third set either.
So, anyway, i have to decide whether or not to see if the band wants to do what I think we need to do to fix the problems and I think we have. Our LG is out for 6 weeks and that's about when our next gig is. I think we need a lot of work, REAL rehearsals and learning songs that have parts, not just guitar jamming over yet another 12bar song by some unknown blues artist. Real songs that people might know and actually want to hear.
Would I just be wasting my time? Or am I wrong about the whole thing? Or, should I just ride it out till the horse totally collapses?
It happened again. We played last weekend at a venue that's become a regular spot for us. It was a new spot the first time we played there and we had a good crowd. The place is no longer new and I think the crowd has just naturally dwindled as most places do. Anyway we played Dec. 22nd which I expected to be slow, being so close to Christmas, and it was. Very slim crowd when we started pllaying.
The band leader had decided to play 3 piece, because of our lead guitar players heart surgery, instead of getting another piece, for the extra money. And we played okay. That BL actually played some things on guitar that I had never heard him play and really didn't think he could play. So that part was allright. Despite that, by the end of the second set there was nobody there. When we were getting ready to go back for the third set the bar manager asked us if we wanted to check out early. The BL said "yeah, there's no sense in playing to nobody."
But again the point, MY point is, WHY are we losing the crowd that we DO have? Not drawing a crowd is one thing but not being able to hold the crowd that you get is another. My point has been, if you're read any of my threads here, that we're doing too much I-IV-V blues based music with too many guitar solos, and frankly, now that I think about it, just too much of the BL. The BL is good but I think he believes his own publicity and thinks he's all that and I don't think the listeners feel the same way. In a typical night I might sing two songs, the lead guitarist one or two. All of the other songs are sung by the BL. At the gig discussed above in two sets I didn't' sing any songs, and I don't know that I would have in a third set either.
So, anyway, i have to decide whether or not to see if the band wants to do what I think we need to do to fix the problems and I think we have. Our LG is out for 6 weeks and that's about when our next gig is. I think we need a lot of work, REAL rehearsals and learning songs that have parts, not just guitar jamming over yet another 12bar song by some unknown blues artist. Real songs that people might know and actually want to hear.
Would I just be wasting my time? Or am I wrong about the whole thing? Or, should I just ride it out till the horse totally collapses?
It happened again. We played last weekend at a venue that's become a regular spot for us. It was a new spot the first time we played there and we had a good crowd. The place is no longer new and I think the crowd has just naturally dwindled as most places do. Anyway we played Dec. 22nd which I expected to be slow, being so close to Christmas, and it was. Very slim crowd when we started pllaying.
The band leader had decided to play 3 piece, because of our lead guitar players heart surgery, instead of getting another piece, for the extra money. And we played okay. That BL actually played some things on guitar that I had never heard him play and really didn't think he could play. So that part was allright. Despite that, by the end of the second set there was nobody there. When we were getting ready to go back for the third set the bar manager asked us if we wanted to check out early. The BL said "yeah, there's no sense in playing to nobody."
But again the point, MY point is, WHY are we losing the crowd that we DO have? Not drawing a crowd is one thing but not being able to hold the crowd that you get is another. My point has been, if you're read any of my threads here, that we're doing too much I-IV-V blues based music with too many guitar solos, and frankly, now that I think about it, just too much of the BL. The BL is good but I think he believes his own publicity and thinks he's all that and I don't think the listeners feel the same way. In a typical night I might sing two songs, the lead guitarist one or two. All of the other songs are sung by the BL. At the gig discussed above in two sets I didn't' sing any songs, and I don't know that I would have in a third set either.
So, anyway, i have to decide whether or not to see if the band wants to do what I think we need to do to fix the problems and I think we have. Our LG is out for 6 weeks and that's about when our next gig is. I think we need a lot of work, REAL rehearsals and learning songs that have parts, not just guitar jamming over yet another 12bar song by some unknown blues artist. Real songs that people might know and actually want to hear.
Would I just be wasting my time? Or am I wrong about the whole thing? Or, should I just ride it out till the horse totally collapses?