• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Another gig where we quit early because the crowd left.

If I look back at history, prior to Rock and Roll, it was always about going to see and be seen. It seems like the whole "We're going to hear someone." came about from the initial weekend warriors that tried to emulate their Claptons, Hendrix', and Pages - that kind of thing - when electric instruments were new.

It's no longer interesting for band members stand up on stage with an electric guitar between their loins pointing it at the dance floor but it just happened to be a 70 year anomaly. It has nothing to do with how much sensory bombardment we get. We are just exiting a 70 year phenomenon, fast.

Interesting assertions. Mot much of substance in any of that by way of an argument.

Is there something about that prior “70 year phenomenon” as you call it that upsets you personally? You come across as being rather hostile towards it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tony Bassplayer
Well, there was a time (possibly before yours) when the music and the experience of being there provided its own magic and was more than enough with no theatrics required.

Not any more apparently. Nowadays people are so overstimulated by the constant sensory barrage they’re subjected to that “just” listening and getting into anything isn’t enough. Audiences now require a full stage show with lights, their cameras, and plenty of action - or it “just” doesn’t work for them.

Different world. Different people. Different mindset. So it goes.

“It’s not the times, it’s just the dream that died.” as an old song put it. :)
There was a time when making a living at music was not as difficult as it is now. Consequently, the overall quality of entertainment has deteriorated as pros are replaced by hobbyists. I still think there is no need for theatrics if the music is top notch.
 
Sorry, it's up to the band to read the room and provide what the audience is looking for.

If you don't engage the audience and keep them there with whatever it is you're doing, that's on you as the "entertainment", not on the audience.

"The audience is never wrong" as 40Hz correctly put it.

If you think the audience is wrong because they just "don't get it", I think it's you, the band, that doesn't get it.
 
There was a time when making a living at music was not as difficult as it is now. Consequently, the overall quality of entertainment has deteriorated as pros are replaced by hobbyists. I still think there is no need for theatrics if the music is top notch.
Ironically, every POP tour is filled with theatrics.
I'm wondering if that's part of the problem, beautiful scantily clad women walking through fog banks and implied pyrotechnics with incredible lighting and multilevel stages...
Opposed to three middle aged men at a local pub with bad lighting and no bells and whistles.
It's at all possible that over the top stage production has at some level ruined live music for the rest of us.
 
Ironically, every POP tour is filled with theatrics.
I'm wondering if that's part of the problem, beautiful scantily clad women walking through fog banks and implied pyrotechnics with incredible lighting and multilevel stages...
Opposed to three middle aged men at a local pub with bad lighting and no bells and whistles.
It's at all possible that over the top stage production has at some level ruined live music for the rest of us.
People listening with their eyes. ;)

But these pop tours usually have top level musicians (whether or not you like the music is another matter).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lance Bunyon
No. Audiences can just not get it because they may not know a single thing about music.
Unfortunately, that doesn't disqualify them from having an opinion because they've bought the ticket.
I'm fine with that.
You don't have to know about music to appreciate music.

If you're not playing to your audience, who the hell are you playing to, your own ego?

Geez dude...
 
Mainly your claim that audiences are bombarded with sensory overload and need a show... That was the main thing I had an issue with... I agree with what you said about "tight" arrangements and concise structure.

There’s been a ton of documented and juried medical research conducted both here and abroad on the topic of sensory overload due to media bombardment. And it’s been established it’s a real problem. Not just some “could it be that” Discovery Channel pseudoscience blurb.

Sensory overload produces a state of unfocused but pervasive low key anxiety, resulting in things like: shortened attention spans, the inability to sit still for more than 10 minutes, unprovoked or minimally provoked bursts of anger and fits of rage, a fascination with violence and incidents of public humiliation, constant unnecessary multitasking such as texting or videoing while doing something else, the desire for constantly increasing levels of sensory stimulation, the constant feeling you may be missing something… the list goes on.

Sensory overload brought about by an increasingly linked and available on-demand world is a real problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lance Bunyon
An audience is often very wrong and that's because they only often know what little they know. However, I agree, its not an argument the band will win anyway.

Sorry, it's up to the band to read the room and provide what the audience is looking for.

If you don't engage the audience and keep them there with whatever it is you're doing, that's on you as the "entertainment", not on the audience.

"The audience is never wrong" as 40Hz correctly put it.

If you think the audience is wrong because they just "don't get it", I think it's you, the band, that doesn't get it.

I have a weird theory: I think to a certain extent bar bands are training their audiences to expect the same songs every other bar band plays. These songs are not necessarily chosen because "it's what the audience wants", they're chosen because the musicians are too lazy or unskilled to learn anything else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pepj
There’s been a ton of documented and juried medical research conducted both here and abroad on the topic of sensory overload due to media bombardment. And it’s been established it’s a real problem. Not just some “could it be that” Discovery Channel pseudoscience blurb.

But again, you're blaming the audience, because, the band couldn't possibly be wrong, right?
The bands I'm in have had no issues keeping younger people dancing all the way to last call - you just have to play the music they want to hear and dance to. A lot of dad-bands just don't play that stuff.
 
You don't have to know about music to appreciate music.

If you're not playing to your audience, who the hell are you playing to, your own ego?

Geez dude...

It rather helps if you aren't tone deaf and you actually actively listen to it.

Ego is a great driver and I can't think of a good musician I know who doesn't have one. I know of a fair few who like to pretend they dont have one though.
Again, fine with that, walk it.
 
The problem with these older guys is they grew up in the guitar hero and they think everybody’s just enamored with endless soloing. Nothing could be further from the truth. Especially younger people want to dance and sing along. Girls don’t dance to guitar solos. Also they’re very reluctant to change. If you say hey maybe we should learn some Bruno Mars they’re like no we want to play some Robin Trower and some Allman Brothers.

^^^ This ^^^

19/ 20 times or better your audience is made up of regular folks, not musicians. They want to dance, eat/ drink and party.
 
I have a weird theory: I think to a certain extent bar bands are training their audiences to expect the same songs every other bar band plays. These songs are not necessarily chosen because "it's what the audience wants", they're chosen because the musicians are too lazy or unskilled to learn anything else.
My point was, go ahead and blame the audience and think they left because they don't know anything. You're still standing on stage to an empty room.

If you don't figure out what they want to hear to keep them there, you won't be playing there much longer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: frankie5string
It rather helps if you aren't tone deaf and you actually actively listen to it.

Ego is a great driver and I can't think of a good musician I know who doesn't have one. I know of a fair few who like to pretend they dont have one though.
Again, fine with that, walk it.
All fine but if it's not your job as a band to grab the attention of the listener and hold it, then what is your job?
 
Thats fine. I'll take that job on. If we suck, I'll know.

But, conversely no one is telling me we were great when I know we really weren't. I'm not going to ask for much help from those same people because we just aren't hearing the same things.
 
It rather helps if you aren't tone deaf and you actually actively listen to it.

Ego is a great driver and I can't think of a good musician I know who doesn't have one. I know of a fair few who like to pretend they dont have one though.
Again, fine with that, walk it.

Yes, everyone who stands up and performs has some ego. There's a difference between that and being so out of touch that if an audience doesn't like what you do, they are somehow not listening right.