There is always the classifieds... I'd take a used Aggie Th-350 over a new PF-500 any day... Just going on reliability reports...
Me too, any day of the week.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
There is always the classifieds... I'd take a used Aggie Th-350 over a new PF-500 any day... Just going on reliability reports...
SVT 200T
SVT350
SVT450
SVT 1540
Off the top of my head, those were all pretty sucktacular - and hardly worthy of the SVT name...
- georgestrings
There is always the classifieds... I'd take a used Aggie Th-350 over a new PF-500 any day... Just going on reliability reports...
Get a VT pedal![]()
Having a TH500, PF500 and a VT pedal I can say the VT will get close but it's not the same.
I have a feeling some would think otherwise if it had the Ampeg and SVT names on it.![]()
Finally a post from you that is worthy! Great post!
Bazinga indeed! This was hillarious!
Jerrold Tiers point I believe is when SLM owned Ampeg they did not treat customers or products this way and SLM surely didn't liquidate past product spares when they bought out Ampeg from MTI unlike the current owner.
But, the point really was how absolutely rotten is the idea that the product is, or should be considered to be, "junk" after the point that the manufacturer stops "supporting" it. Which for most is when it goes off warranty.
It's different for a wireless, or a laptop..... you MUST have special info and equipment for them, and they usually are not as expensive to buy. Cisco did that to me, and after some thought, I decided I could understand their attitude. They must get a huge volume of calls, many of which are really caused by a "problem between the chair and keyboard" (PEBCAK) I also fixed the problem I had....
When Ampeg built my 1963 B-15N, the idea that it would still be in service 50 years later would have been beyond their imaginations. Who would have thought? The marketing guys might have wanted to price it higher or build it cheaper.
This was a beater that was restored from the chassis up and is now better than new. And there are a lot of them still out there.
My 400RB quit on a gig and I chucked it.
Not to be provocative, but being rebuilt isn't quite what i think we are talking about, as cool as it is...
If we are talking about reliable giging amps, my 25 year old gk400rb is still pumping and hasn't had more than a squirt of deoxit, and never failed...
If that's still going in 25 years as is, then we will have something to be in awe of.
![]()
The nice thing about this amp is that it was working perfectly well despite the rough shape. The restoration was mostly for cosmetic and safety (three conductor power cord) reasons. All amps eventually need maintenance to keep them in regular service. Some components such as electrolytic capacitors have a limited lifetime. But, except for the chassis, there isn't anything on these amps that can't be replaced so they can be maintained indefinitely.
The same can't be said about modern transistorized amps. Some key parts will become obsolete and not be available at some point. Sometimes work arounds are available but more often than not, they cost too much to repair.
I work out Guitar Center, we have had a ton of the Ampeg PF series come in broken. I always stress getting extended coverage on them because of the frequent problems. Even after telling people about the issues, they still buy them. They sound halfway decent and are fairly inexpensive.