TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I started out on short scale and played them for years before I got my first Fender Jazz, which I hated for years. I've always said that I believe it's easier to go from long scale to short scale, than the other way around. Now I'm comfortable with both, but my favorite bass to play is still, and will always be my SS Coronado II which was my second bass that I owned. My first was a SS Kalamazoo KB which was really junk and would never stay tuned.
Back on point, there's absolutely a down side to short scales, and I'm surprised no one has brought it up. The down side is string selection, not as many choices as with LS, and SS tend to buzz easier so a GOOD setup and string choice is essential. Other than that, SS's rule!!!
I own 4 shorties, Coronado II, Musicmaster, SG, Jag, and I'm listing them in the order of my preference. People recommend the Jag a lot but it's my least favorite shorty.
057912
So you'd need a higher action to avoid buzzing I guess?
The "lighter, faster, more comfortable" argument for short scale basses doesn't hold up, either. My last shorty was a Dan Armstrong - heavy with a P-bass-like neck. I also played a Mustang bass for a bit. I'm on Gibson Thunderbirds now and the thin neck profile in a 34" scale is perfect, and body-wise, those basses are LONG. Something like a Fender Jazz (what I learned on) might also be a good difference splitter. A thinner neck profile in a 34" scale might be what you need!
Tone-wise, with the right amount of patience and pedals and amp selection, you can dial up pretty much anything these days. Do what you love, stick with what you know.