A few things perhaps worth knowing:
As with Jazz Basses, Thunderbirds and other offset body designs, they are not very stable on regular guitar stands. I use a Hercules stand for mine.
The finish on the ceruse ones (as both of mine are) is very thin. While sealed there's no heavy clearcoat. This gives an elegant look though if one gets a small ding or scratch there's not going to be the same ability to buff that out as with most gloss finishes (I had an F Bass with ceruse finish which had more traditional gloss clear coat over it - quite different).
He changed the finish to one that retains the matt/satin finish better. On my first one, contact points started to buff to gloss with use (I eventually polished the rest to keep it uniform - it looks good both ways - not so great with random shiny spots). The 5 string keeps the matt texture much better. I assume this is not a concern on his current builds.
I chose the Jescar evo gold frets and really like them. Not as hard as stainless but still show no wear. I like the look of them as well. Due to the fret color (and I had the copper strings but I switched those out on that bass), I opted for a brass nut and if I had it to do over, I'd go with graphite as I think it would better fit the aesthetics.
On the aesthetics, the headless designs really do fit, though if neckdive is a concern with a headstock, I don't experience that with mine at all.
Also on the aesthetics, like with Dingwall and Darkglass, these seem to largely appeal to djent, prog, metal players, etc but work great for any genre (the pics I posted were with blues great Malford Milligan and jazz great Ronnie Foster - no issues or sideways glances...)
The filled brass tube side dots on the 5 string look awesome but disappear on a dark stage for me if I'm not wearing glasses.
None of these are negatives IMO, just worth considering, and the positives are far greater.
