• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Anyone catch the reimagined "Matlock" reboot?

Alkali Ike

Gold Supporting Member
Jan 1, 2011
2,850
15,650
Pacific Northwest
www.xdrguy.com
Disclosures
I never actually learned to play very well
I don't watch much regular network TV these days but I happened to catch this teaser premier. I thought it was pretty darned good. It has "network tv court drama procedural" all over it but it's still fresh. The episode ended with a very unexpected plot twist. I'll be sticking with it.

The first episode can be streamed for free:

 
The character is a senior whose last name happens to be Matlock and she practices law. That's pretty much the only similarities to the original show.
Yes, with a very interesting twist at the end to truly not be a reissue of the original series.
 
I don't watch much regular network TV these days but I happened to catch this teaser premier. I thought it was pretty darned good. It has "network tv court drama procedural" all over it but it's still fresh. The episode ended with a very unexpected plot twist. I'll be sticking with it.

The first episode can be streamed for free:

It's funny - you mentioned Matlock, and I immediately heard the theme song!
 
Nothing in common with the Andy Griffith series, other than the name (much like the recent Perry Mason reboot). Kathy Bates is terrific, and there are some interesting touches. However, I'm a retired lawyer. I can take most law-based shows with a giant grain of salt, but the twist at the end makes Matlock's actions so unethical that I couldn't watch the show any more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winslow
Maddie seems to be ethical in her conduct relating to cases she works on for the firm. No?

But her pursuit of justice for the opioid coverup that killed her daughter is a whole different thing.
Yes, no particular issues with her conduct relating to the case that was at the center of the episode. But the implication that she has gotten herself into the firm so that she can later undermine one of the firm's chief clients is ethically troubling. The attorney-client privilege is not to be taken lightly.