• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Anyone else have a 'type'?

J.Wolf

Supporting Member
Commercial User
Apr 29, 2003
9,078
9,799
Asheville, NC
www.facebook.com
Disclosures
Contributor- Bass Musician Magazine | Marketing Manager- Trickfish Amplification
I guess it's finally time to admit that the only basses that stick around long term here are ash body basses. Some of them are heavy norther, some are super light swamp. Honestly, most of the time it's ash/maple, provided that they have a good midrange voice and aren't too scooped. I think for solid body fretted basses, Im really only comfortable with the attack and frequency presentation of ash, when it's done right. I always want to love alder, mahogany etc. as a body wood, but 9/10 it just doesn't quite sit right. 4, 5, 6, J, P, humbuckers, bolt on, neck thru, theyre all just ash. Minus that nice Koa Taylor in the back.

Anyone else find that they gravitate to one type of wood for a body or fingerboard? Besides neck wood, the body and board seem (to my ears) to have most impact on tone. Unless you're one of those that believe 'all woods sound the same and anyways, its all in the fingers', in which case, perhaps this thread may not be for you :)

IMG_3115.JPG
 
Since getting my 1st 5string now that's all I want. I think they just sound better as opposed to the tighter string spacing that i also want in everything i play now. Since the necks are usually a little bit bigger and wider i feel like it translates to a bigger tone. A little bit deeper tone im going to say. Ive definitely noticed. Also i love the tone of every Warwick ive ever heard so i guess that counts as a type.
0828231902_HDR.jpg

IMG_20231127_122740691_HDR.jpg
 
As my collection has grown, I've tried to diversify. I've got super short scales, fanned frets, octave-course, medium scales, fretted, fretless, EUB, headless, Bass VI, 4, 5, 6 and 10 strings, etc.

I guess the 1 thing that's consistent across the majority is that they have maple necks, either regular or roasted, with only a couple outliers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hsg
I guess my "type" would be more Jazz than anything else but it really comes down to the individual bass. Wood-wise it's the same. I do think the wood makes a difference, but it seems to be more about the specific piece of wood than the type (making predictions based on wood type a roll of the dice as much as anything). Having said that, if I special order a bass chances are pretty good that the body is going to be ash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hsg and unresolved
Anyone else find that they gravitate to one type of wood for a body or fingerboard?........Unless you're one of those that believe 'all woods sound the same and anyways, its all in the fingers', in which case, perhaps this thread may not be for you :)
i'm definitely "one of those" :p however, i still "gravitate to one type of wood for a body" = paulownia/empress. it's so lightweight: i only want lightweight EBs --- so that's the "type" i am! ;)
 
I guess it's finally time to admit that the only basses that stick around long term here are ash body basses. Some of them are heavy norther, some are super light swamp. Honestly, most of the time it's ash/maple, provided that they have a good midrange voice and aren't too scooped. I think for solid body fretted basses, Im really only comfortable with the attack and frequency presentation of ash, when it's done right. I always want to love alder, mahogany etc. as a body wood, but 9/10 it just doesn't quite sit right. 4, 5, 6, J, P, humbuckers, bolt on, neck thru, theyre all just ash. Minus that nice Koa Taylor in the back.

Anyone else find that they gravitate to one type of wood for a body or fingerboard? Besides neck wood, the body and board seem (to my ears) to have most impact on tone. Unless you're one of those that believe 'all woods sound the same and anyways, its all in the fingers', in which case, perhaps this thread may not be for you :)

View attachment 5274288

I'm with you on this one. I've found that I gravitate towards ash bodies (and necks, sometimes), too. My favorite so far is my Fodera Emperor Standard 5 Classic--ash body, maple neck, rosewood board. It has just the right midrange bite, and I don't really mind the weight (it's just shy of 11 lbs).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hsg
I can hear the difference between a hollowbody and a solid body, but it's hard to say I can hear any difference between a semi-hollow and a hollow.

On a solid body bass I believe that strings and electronics make more difference to the sound than anything else, making wood irrelevant to me on solid bodies.

If I have a type, it's Gretsch. I have three of them: one hollow, one solid, one chambered. I simply like the way all of them sound.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Levent and Hsg