• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Anyone else think Ibanez should change their SR body?

From an instrument designer/maker's perspective, I've always really liked the SR shape.
It is very difficult to design something that is original enough to be identifiable, yet still "familiar"/"comfortable" looking
to the majority of players. Most original designs trend towards the "unique"/unusual shapes.

The SR manages to be both "normal" looking and yet clearly its own shape, which is no small feat.
In fact, my favorite variation (visually) on the SR was always the SRX / SDGR series, because the body binding really celebrated the shape of the instrument.

It also succeeds in some production-related parameters that are less immediately obvious. The rounder horns, more "open" cutaway angle, and sloped heel allow for simpler and more efficient sanding than traditional P/J-style bodies, which means a lot in a production environment.
Again, it's not easy to design in all these kinds of aspects while keeping something "familiar" looking.

There are a few other instruments I admire for the same reasons. The Zon Sonus is another good example of this.

Obviously, the proof is that the model has persisted for so long, and through so many variations.
While writing this post, I did a quick Google image search and came across the 30th Anniversary Premium SR
(with the oval soundholes) and couldn't help but think - "Wow, that's really appealing. I kinda want one."
Considering I make basses for a living, that's saying something, I suppose.

Cheers,
Martin

nice expert explanation of what owners feel but can’t explain.
 
Honestly I think the SR is one of the sleekest modern designs of any bass out there. An evolution of design that makes most commons bass guitars seem dated by comparison. The sound isn’t for everybody. But the different woods and pickups available across the line mean you can probably find one that works for you. The build quality and playability is outstanding. Maybe it’s just me, but I can never get a Fender (which I love) as surgically set up as an SR.
 
I'm not bashing Ibanez! I played them on stage from 97- 2002 in my nu metal days. I'm looking for a 24 fret bass and every time I see a Ibanez I think.. Damn these are some boring looking basses. They are hella good basses, especially in the $700 price range, but the same body shape since the 80's. Am I alone in thinking aboot this?
Can't beat the weight and feel. Just like that groupie at 3 am, it's all about the performance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jakeman
I'm not bashing Ibanez! I played them on stage from 97- 2002 in my nu metal days. I'm looking for a 24 fret bass and every time I see a Ibanez I think.. Damn these are some boring looking basses. They are hella good basses, especially in the $700 price range, but the same body shape since the 80's. Am I alone in thinking aboot this?

I have a really nice Fender Deluxe Jazz Bass 24 for sale on eBay right now. Definitely on the low end of your price range.
 
Both my basses right now are Soundgear, 4 string and 6 string. I think it's a cool design that's definitely distinct, but still feels familiar and, most importantly very practical and ergonomic. It can fit into practically any setting. I'd quirk my eyebrow a bassist at a modern jazz fusion gig pulled out a Rickenbacker or something super pointy, but a soundgear can fit into jazz, modern rock, metal, hiphop and look good doing it.

If a Soundgear looks boring, I think it's more because of the finish and woods than the shape. If they're painted one solid color I do think they can look kinda boring. And some of them have woods or finishes that just don't look great compared to others in the same series (Looking at you SR50x)

JdRDn2K.jpg
v9aFteZ.jpg
XItbrMt.jpg


idk. I think they look nice.
 
Bigger headstock would be ideal to jab my drunken singer in the ribs so that he remembers his queues or when to stop babbling between songs. :)

Just add a shiv to the end of the existing one, and make sure you attach it in a way that you can knock it off the bass quickly after with a good swing past your amp, so there's no proof/evidence it was you doing the attack.

No, I don't spend time thinking about ways to attack my band members. Nope.
 
Just add a shiv to the end of the existing one, and make sure you attach it in a way that you can knock it off the bass quickly after with a good swing past your amp, so there's no proof/evidence it was you doing the attack.

No, I don't spend time thinking about ways to attack my band members. Nope.

Ha, you should delete your post- could eventually be used as admissible evidence. :)
 
I love the SR shape. Very comfortable, and the sitting/standing change makes very little difference to your playing.
I bought my first SR in 2006 and the second one in 2008, only because the first one got stolen. I still play it to this day and I would only consider saying goodbye to it for a similarly ergonomic bass, such as an NS Design or Steinberger.
 
I'm not bashing Ibanez! I played them on stage from 97- 2002 in my nu metal days. I'm looking for a 24 fret bass and every time I see a Ibanez I think.. Damn these are some boring looking basses. They are hella good basses, especially in the $700 price range, but the same body shape since the 80's. Am I alone in thinking aboot this?
Although I don't play mine these days, I believe the SGR body shape is one of the most comfortable available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DTRN

Latest posts