From an instrument designer/maker's perspective, I've always really liked the SR shape.
It is very difficult to design something that is original enough to be identifiable, yet still "familiar"/"comfortable" looking
to the majority of players. Most original designs trend towards the "unique"/unusual shapes.
The SR manages to be both "normal" looking and yet clearly its own shape, which is no small feat.
In fact, my favorite variation (visually) on the SR was always the SRX / SDGR series, because the body binding really celebrated the shape of the instrument.
It also succeeds in some production-related parameters that are less immediately obvious. The rounder horns, more "open" cutaway angle, and sloped heel allow for simpler and more efficient sanding than traditional P/J-style bodies, which means a lot in a production environment.
Again, it's not easy to design in all these kinds of aspects while keeping something "familiar" looking.
There are a few other instruments I admire for the same reasons. The Zon Sonus is another good example of this.
Obviously, the proof is that the model has persisted for so long, and through so many variations.
While writing this post, I did a quick Google image search and came across the 30th Anniversary Premium SR
(with the oval soundholes) and couldn't help but think - "Wow, that's really appealing. I kinda want one."
Considering I make basses for a living, that's saying something, I suppose.
Cheers,
Martin
nice expert explanation of what owners feel but can’t explain.