• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Are Kay basses really worth it?

How does the Englehardt compare to the Kay?
That depends on the Kay. Englehardt continued many of the practices of Kay's late-'60s, production, including heavier finishes, and trimmed down some, such as eliminating the outer linings. Quality woods were getting harder to source by the '70s, so Engles have Indian rosewood rather than the Brazilian rosewood of earlier Kay production, and generally less nice body veneers. Other than that sort of detail they are essentially the same instrument, coming from the same molds, cut on the same jigs using the same practices by many of the same workers in the early Englehardt days, and with the same design issues. As I've written on this thread many times, I'm sure, what matters is the setup. With a good professional setup an Engle can perform as well as any well setup Kay, and it'll be cheaper to buy.
 
Each Kay bass is unique. I currently have three (front to back): 1950 C1, 1950 M1B, 1941 S-9. I’ve owned and played modern factory basses, too, but for the bluegrass and country music I play Kay basses make a lot of sense and never need apology. Plus, if I ever want another Eastman, or a nice Shen Hybrid or a Thomann, I can order one.


View attachment 5033774 View attachment 5033775
Whoa, that’s some serious overstand for a Kay!

Who did the work?