That's the one I was thinking of.Invalid Link Removed
The Klippel website goes into much greater depth as well, but it's not exactly light reading.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
That's the one I was thinking of.Invalid Link Removed
The Klippel website goes into much greater depth as well, but it's not exactly light reading.
I don't have the bookmark on this phone, but, couple years ago, might've been Passinwind that linked to an applet that was a sort of laser scan of a speaker operating you could see in slow motion. It illustrated cone rocking as well as the "wave" from center to edge at various frequencies.
Anyway, he digs out an ancient album, and I was thinking "what kind of dull boring ancient junk is he putting on?" Guess what--it was an early, I mean early version of "Train Kept A-Rollin". Pre-dated Aerosmith by many decades but it had just as much fire as the Toxic Twins, even had distorted guitar.
I moved shortly thereafter so I never got to see the old man and his hi-fi again.
the kinetic energy looks as if it's capable of virtually slingshot-ing the wave off the cone which would have no focus, as the sound was hurled off the peaks of those tsunamis. It wound sound like "a big globe" and have no definition between high's and low's time separation.That's the one I was thinking of.
...whoa! If you like telecasters! ...and I do.Was it this version?

Yeah, you're probably better off with 2 18s...I'm thinking on something like a 36" that ripple effect would get pretty out of hand without an extremely stiff cone, but I can't predict what that would sound like.
Was it this version?