Originally posted by rickreyn
I was reading a 1997 Bass Player 5-string Shootout and noted that of all the quality basses tested, none were Warwicks! I had to ask why? Then I stopped to think. At my local Mars, the Warwicks seem to grow moss on the walls. Why? Another local music store that carried Warwicks had to run a fire sale to ultimately get rid of them. Why? What I have noticed in my limited travels is that when Warwicks are "pushed out the door" after growing moss, they get lapped up. Why? In the CD reviews in Bass Player, rarely are the players' main axes Warwicks. Why?
Funny you mention this.. i've been reading BP mag for about 2 years now, and the thing that i've always noticed is that the reviews they do are pretty much always high-end basses.. never mid-range ones.. the BP reviewers seem to have a lot of affinity towards certain brands, and have prejudice against other brands.. i think it's the same with the stores.. It's partly patriotism ( you're looking for a nice bass sir ? why not try this USA made fender ?! ) and partly ' following the others '..
humans are pretty much like sheep.. once one jumps over the fence, the others will follow.. if there are 2 stores in town that sell mostly fenders, the others will follow.. that's todays economy.. follow the leaders or perrish in an attempt to be different.
about the players.. in Holland we have this predicate / saying / expression which goes like this : " wat the boer niet kent, dat vreet ie ook niet ".. roughly translated it says " the farmer doesn't eat that which he doesn't know ".. it means a lot of people don't try new things because they're somewhat satisfied with what they currently have.. how can you improve without trying new stuff ? it's impossible..
the other thing i'd like to note.. playing bass is very similar to a marriage..
you meet a bass/girl you like.. you start dating the girl ( or go to the store frequently to try the bass out ) and then you decide to take the plunge.. you marry the girl ( buy the bass )..
once you're married to her ( or bought her ) you really get to know her, and learn about her pro's and con's.. no marriage is perfect.. but after time you get to know her real close, and start to really, really love her.. you get used to her.. you adjust yourself to her wishes and standards.. and after a while it's perfect harmony..
bottom line is : if you take the time to get to know your bass.. you'll like it more and more as time goes by..
that some people say that warwicks lack bottom is just hillarious.. warwicks have the most bassy sound imaginable.. it is true that they're not really strong in the upper mids, but the bottom is superior..
the necks are thick, indeed.. the basses are also rather heavy, indeed.. but this thick, hard and heavy wood does in fact contribute to the typical sound the warwicks have.
personally i really dig the warwick sound.. i've tried pretty much all warwick-models ( gotta love those Huge stores in Germany that are official warwick represents

), and the one i liked the most is actually the Streamer LX.. i liked it better than the Streamer Stage I and Stage II.. the neck-thru sounds nice, but the bolt-on neck adds a little more punch to the sound that i really, really like..
I've decided to get an LX-5 in natural-finish in June.