TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It gets worse... I'm storing all my music on a years-old iPod classic.Uh oh ... you mentioned HiFi and Bose in the same post. Prepare to get flamed
Yeah, I get it. When I took the test, I was almost always able to tell 128k from 320k, but 320k and WAV were nearly impossible to distinguish.Honestly, if I listen to rips of stuff at like 256K+ bitrate using a good encoder like LAME, I don't find anything objectionable with MP3's or have any need for AIFF or FLAC.
I've recently begun my adventure into the world of high fidelity listening. While I don't exactly have golden ears, it appears I can differentiate recording qualities to a small extent --about 66% of the time-- according to an NPR listening test.
A few years ago, I received a pair of open-back Sennheiser HD558 headphones. I didn't know what these were for at the time. They lacked bass and everything sounded flat. A mistake? No! It was then I read that they were meant to play music this way, without meddling with equalization. I was getting a more natural sonic experience.
A few days back, I stumbled upon an unbelievable deal at a garage sale -- a Bose SoundDock Portable for $4. At that price, I assumed something was wrong but tried it anyway. It was perfect. The owners just wanted to free up space and already had a bunch of Bose gear.
The SoundDock sounds very good and now I play a lot more music when I'm home. However, i have concluded that while this system is a significant upgrade from the no-name Bluetooth speaker I was using, it is a bit heavy on the bass side, even with flat EQ. Thus began my quest for a system capable of reproducing sound with less artificial and more natural flavoring.
I'm in the process of overhauling my library. Though I won't claim to hear all the minute differences, nor do I ever really expect to be able, I am replacing the majority of my library with higher quality rips -- 128 kbps AACs/mp3s/MPEG with 300+ kbps lossless AIFFs -- and taking advantage of this 160 GB iPod I own. Reason being, a lot of the music on my phone was ripped in its most compact state: 128kbps mp3 files. I want to see how listening to lossless affects things.
So, anyone else here doing the HiFi thing?
It’s mostly hype
listening is subjective, so buy what you like to hear
The best ears in the world can’t tell 320kbps mp3 from lossless with any degree of accuracy
Me Too. Have 17,000 songs so far. But the old classic is starting to lose battery life. It is amazing to me how long this thing has lasted, I have used it every day for many years.It gets worse... I'm storing all my music on a years-old iPod classic.
I have some slightly hifi gear... 85wpc Sony from the late 70s with an MK passive sub and JBL 4408 2-ways in the music room. Early 70s Kenwood 35wpc with some Ohm speakers in the house... Mid 60s all tube German table top radio in tje shop.
The music room is hooked to My DAW and about 600gb of music (mostly 320bit max VBR MP3s). The house setup streams online sources via bluetooth. The shop set up has an aux input for my LG V20's hifi dacs and the misc random 20gb of files I keep on it any given day (it also pushes some decent earbuds at the office)
I also have some 4408's. Still one of my favourites. I changed the foam surrounds a few weeks ago.
Yeah, I get it. When I took the test, I was almost always able to tell 128k from 320k, but 320k and WAV were nearly impossible to distinguish.