Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Ask Vox.
- Thread starter stedtale
- Start date
For a supposed "know it all", She couldn't answer any of my ten questions, save for "are you suppsed to be female"
I even asked "are you basically just an algorithm linked to a search engine?" and she couldn't answer that...She has an identity comlpex, methinks.
Or she's in denial
I even asked "are you basically just an algorithm linked to a search engine?" and she couldn't answer that...She has an identity comlpex, methinks.
Or she's in denial
For a supposed "know it all", She couldn't answer any of my ten questions, save for "are you suppsed to be female"
I even asked "are you basically just an algorithm linked to a search engine?" and she couldn't answer that...She has an identity comlpex, methinks.
now she knows....
Are you basically just algorithm linked to search engine?
dude,you olny use ' to show ownership
like
Bob's Music Shop is ok
What's talkbass? is not ok
you got PWNT
indded I did, but this si the interwebs, and i couldn't care less. irreguardless of what others may think it's been an issue for me, were I stand, not they're's.dude,you olny use ' to show ownership
like
Bob's Music Shop is ok
What's talkbass? is not ok
you got PWNT
oh and
http://www.write101.com/sample.htm
1. To show OMISSION
What's a nice kid like me doing in a place like this?
We started with two words, what and is, but because this is informal writing, we want to express it informally, so we omit a letter from the word is. Because we're well brought up little Vegemites (remember?), we let people know what we've done.
I could've danced all night ... (could have, not could 'of')
It's time for breakfast (It is time ...)
It's been raining all day. (It has been raining ...)
So, in future whenever you see an apostrophe, make a conscious effort to work out what the original word was before the letter was omitted. Sometimes, as in the case of could've and would've, more than one letter has been omitted.
This will establish good habits and alert you to the role of the apostrophe.
so......
Who's = Who is.....
and
Link Removed
This is one of those cases where it is important to remember that possessive pronouns never take apostrophes, even though possessive nouns do (see it’s/its). “Who’s” always and forever means only “who is,” as in “Who’s that guy with the droopy mustache?” or “who has,” as in “Who’s been eating my porridge?” “Whose” is the possessive form of “who” and is used as follows: “Whose dirty socks are these on the breakfast table?”
Who's PWNT, now?
http://www.write101.com/sample.htm
1. To show OMISSION
What's a nice kid like me doing in a place like this?
We started with two words, what and is, but because this is informal writing, we want to express it informally, so we omit a letter from the word is. Because we're well brought up little Vegemites (remember?), we let people know what we've done.
I could've danced all night ... (could have, not could 'of')
It's time for breakfast (It is time ...)
It's been raining all day. (It has been raining ...)
So, in future whenever you see an apostrophe, make a conscious effort to work out what the original word was before the letter was omitted. Sometimes, as in the case of could've and would've, more than one letter has been omitted.
This will establish good habits and alert you to the role of the apostrophe.
so......
Who's = Who is.....
and
Link Removed
This is one of those cases where it is important to remember that possessive pronouns never take apostrophes, even though possessive nouns do (see it’s/its). “Who’s” always and forever means only “who is,” as in “Who’s that guy with the droopy mustache?” or “who has,” as in “Who’s been eating my porridge?” “Whose” is the possessive form of “who” and is used as follows: “Whose dirty socks are these on the breakfast table?”
Who's PWNT, now?
Nothing really.
I just found it funny that his whole big pwnage rebuttal was just a mere 2 minutes after his original post.
There are many possible explanations for it, and I could not care less which it was. I was just simply making a statement.
