• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

At what point are frets “dead”?

David Sutkin

“Bass Upfront” Founder
Commercial User
Apr 20, 2017
2,636
8,106
58
Brooklyn, NY
Before I found TB, I’d never have even considered changing out or re-fretting any of my basses but “dead frets” seem to be a pretty popular topic.

I’m curious as to what’s the general determining factor that tells you a fret or frets are spent and should be replaced or fixed?

Thanks
 
It's gone too far when the fretboard has to be scalloped to expose what little remains of the fret tangs. (I have an old harp guitar on which this is the case - still playable, but seriously needs a refret.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: jfh2112
It's gone too far when the fretboard has to be scalloped to expose what little remains of the fret tangs. (I have an old harp guitar on which this is the case - still playable, but seriously needs a refret.)

Thanks for the quick reply, are you suggesting that only when the frets have been work down to being "level with" or "recessed" from the fingerboard is when it's time to change them out?

If frets on a bass appear worn but each note on every string is still clear and discernible, am I to assume the frets are still good and don't need any kind of maintenance?
 
If each note sounds good, it is good.

However, if the strings have worn visually obvious low points in the frets (might be on just one or two), well, then you can literally see that a problem is developing (even if it isn’t yet an actual problem when playing the instrument). Nevertheless, like i said, if it still sounds good, then it’s still good.

You can get a "level and crown" to get the frets all even (leveled) and well-shaped along the tops (crowned) again, but now the frets will be overall less tall (which might be fine, especially for a first level ‘n crown done in a timely manner). Eventually fret wear will crop up again if you keep usiing the instrument in a similar manner, and you can probably get a new level ’n crown. ‘Eventually eventually’ though, the lowest divot will be too low for a level and crown to leave you with sufficient fret height and the frets will have to be replaced (or you could get an entire new neck, I suppose).

For reference, I’ve been playing guitar and later bass for about 35 years now and in that time have had two level ‘n crowns done. Never had a refret. That said, I haven’t owned one guitar that long (my longest owned currently are about 14 years for one of my guitars and 12 years for one of my basses), and now I have a number of each and divide my playing time between them. My most played (and longest owned) guitar is one of the two that I had a level ‘n crown done on, and it’s definitely showing significant fret wear again 12 years later. It’s a bound neck, so it’s "bound to be" a problem eventually (so to speak).

Basswise, I’ve got 5 basses that I divide my playing time between (though I mostly just play 2 of them), and besides the 12 year old one, the others are all only a few years old each, so, in terms of fret wear, so far so good. The bigger problem is, unfortunately, "me wear"! I think I’m gonna wear down before I’ll have to do anything more than a level and crown to any of my basses. If you have an older instrument or play hard using thick steel strings all the time on just one instrument, your mileage will likely vary
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BK bassist
These seem good for another crown job

WardFrets1.jpg




These divots seem way too low to save the frets with a recrown
Unless you like flat frets

th?id=OIP.jpg
 
Thanks for the quick reply, are you suggesting that only when the frets have been work down to being "level with" or "recessed" from the fingerboard is when it's time to change them out?

If frets on a bass appear worn but each note on every string is still clear and discernible, am I to assume the frets are still good and don't need any kind of maintenance?
No, that's far too late, that's what I was trying to say...
 
Here's my take on it. With taller frets, I can have sloppier technique - with really low frets you have to fret perfectly or the string will rattle:
View attachment 3148364

They'd have to be pretty badly worn to present problems. This shot below is my neck with vintage sized frets which are quite a bit smaller than modern jumbo's. They could go to half their current height and still fret cleanly.

20180811_111633.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Levent and Axstar
These seem good for another crown job

View attachment 3147872



These divots seem way too low to save the frets with a recrown
Unless you like flat frets

View attachment 3147873
The irony to that is that my Yamaha bass has frets with much more wear than that (after 20+ years and MAYBE fret polishing done twice during that time). Still plays great and sounds awesome to my ears.

YMMV with just about every instrument, of course.

But I DO agree that when things get this bad, recrowning is probably a good thing, not an absolute though...