• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Avoid the LightSnake!

I bought the lightsnake yesterday, and I will be taking it back tomorrow. Here are my reasons:

1. Audacity and other recording software won't recognize the lightsnake until after I record with Sound Recorder set up EACH TIME I CHANGE INPUTS. So basically, if I have one bass plugged in, and I pull the cord from the it and plug it into another, I have to go through the same Sound Recorder test. Pain in the butt.

2. The 1/4" plug does not lock in to my basses the way a normal cable does. I have a Fender P-Bass and a Warwick bass, and I basically have to stand completely motionless to keep the lightsnake cord from backing out. Ridiculous.

3. Recording quality is poor. The volume recorded from both my basses to the track/file is very low, yet the amplitude of the signal peaks out. My sound is basically clipped but with very low volume. I shouldn't have to run compression AND a boost just to get a tolerable sound.

I don't know if Soundtech was the first to come up with this idea, but this product has a long way to go before its worth the $40 it costs. It's a truly great idea, but its deficiencies are so many that it just isn't worth messing with.
 
You may be expecting more than one little cable can do. #1 sounds like an outstanding software issue to me -- isn't the LightSnake a regular USB audio device? #2, of course, is a legitimate gripe. #3 sounds about par for the course with audio gear. You need a preamp to get the best direct sound. Some gear does cope with poor input better than other gear. I won't say you were just using it wrong until I play with one myself though.