TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
R Baer said:Correct. An iPod, works just fine. The material that is used for the suspension on these drivers is quite stiff when new. You don't need to play really quietly, but keeping the volume moderate for a few hours (coffee house gig volume) will help the surround material loosen up and become more flexible. I certainly notice a difference in the low end between a brand new cab and one that has a few gigs under its belt.
The latest runs of cabs have the logo badge put on with a polyurethane adhesive. I wouldn't recommend trying to peel one off.
I'm afraid I'm going to play too loud too soon and do some damage. I guess I'm nutz. LOL
CTC564 said:"Break In" time is over...and I'm left SPEECHLESS by the clarity and depth of this cabinet...it's the first time I've ever HEARD the focus of my B string...the bottom end of the cab has really "warmed up" nicely and has given me a "throaty" quality to my sound that I've never had before!!!
Sigh...WOW!!!!![]()
I'm also impressed at how well they EQ. Subtle EQ changes make dramatic differences...for the good. I'm also finding that as I switch back and forth between amplifiers (B2000, M9 and MB800) I'm enjoying my Carvin B2000 the best...simply because it appears to be the most uncolored and articulate of the 3.
I haven't gigged with them yet and we all know they will sound totally different on the gig than they do in my studio. However my first gig is Friday and as I've said previously I will report back.Just out of curiosity has anyone tried these cabs with a Tone Hammer 500?
I've used the ML112s with a Markbass F1, a Thunderfunk 750A, and an Aggie Tonehammer 500.
What head do you like the best out of the three?
Well, my choice of head would be driven by the tone I needed for the gig at hand.
If I wanted a bit more wooliness, like a halfway-vintage sort of thing, I'd pick the F1. The VLE would come in handy.
If I wanted a very modern, transparent, slap-oriented sound, I'd go for the Thunderfunk. And the semi-para EQ bands would be nice.
And the head I'm using in my current band (mostly country rock, with a bit of pop and as much R&B as I can push into the song list!) is the Tonehammer. It's tight, aggressive without being honky, and flexible enough to cover what I need for the gig.
Again, something I very much enjoy about the ML112s is that they don't constrain my tone. I can select a head and tweak the EQ to get what I want.
P.S. As for the head I use at home, for woodshedding: I just use one for a couple weeks, and switch it out for another one. Just keeps me fresh. I do the same thing with basses, every few months: get a different one out of the closet.
Tax check came earlier than I expected...hope to place an order for my second ML-112 today!!!
Double the pleasure, double the fun!!!
![]()
Giggin tomorrow night for the first time with my 2 - ML112's. Really looking forward to it! 
Gonna use my Carvin B2000 and GK MB800 and most likely my 55-94 
5StringPocket said:Nice! A pair of ML112 make an ideal modular rig. I use both of mine whenever possible because that stack sounds so full. You're in for a treat.
Neil said:Giggin tomorrow night for the first time with my 2 - ML112's. Really looking forward to it!
Gonna use my Carvin B2000 and GK MB800 and most likely my 55-94
![]()
Very cool!
Though, I wonder if maybe you have a defective F1 -- I've never heard anything close to wooliness (or what I would define as vintage) out of that head.
Caveat: I haven't tweaked around with the controls much though.
Very clean, tight, and pretty transparent -- SI=SO, only louder.