Not yet. Kinda hoped they’d be in by now. Will probably check on them tomorrow, but already have plans to borrow a couple of PA speakers to use a monitors to get through this weekend.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
There are already hundreds of posts on this topic.
One more question…
I have a empty channel and I’ve heard that putting a room mic on the crowd helps alleviate the isolation of wearing IEMs. Any suggestions on type of mic and location?
What system did you settle on? I've just taken the plunge into wireless IEMs, ordered a Sennheiser XSW system. Never used in-ears before, so didn't want to blow a huge lump of coin, but also didn't want to go budget crap like XVIVE. Key requirement was having a "focus mix" control where each receiver can have their own blend between 2 signals - enables me to set up a main mix and a separate mix of my bass and click track from sequences and blend between the two as I desire. Anyone else tuning in to my transmitter can just dial in on the main mix. Or buy their own transmitter.Not yet. Kinda hoped they’d be in by now. Will probably check on them tomorrow, but already have plans to borrow a couple of PA speakers to use a monitors to get through this weekend.
It's far simpler.. depending on which console you have.What system did you settle on? I've just taken the plunge into wireless IEMs, ordered a Sennheiser XSW system. Never used in-ears before, so didn't want to blow a huge lump of coin, but also didn't want to go budget crap like XVIVE. Key requirement was having a "focus mix" control where each receiver can have their own blend between 2 signals - enables me to set up a main mix and a separate mix of my bass and click track from sequences and blend between the two as I desire. Anyone else tuning in to my transmitter can just dial in on the main mix. Or buy their own transmitter.
It's far simpler.. depending on which console you have.
Run a stereo mix OFF the console. You can pan and adjust levels on EVERY channel on the mixer. Ignore what you don't want. Negates blending anything but what YOU want in your mix.
If you're pulling from an Aviom/P16M, then you will be limited to 16 channels so will have to work w/ FOH to determine what is needed stage side.
Is this church or ?
What system did you settle on? I've just taken the plunge into wireless IEMs, ordered a Sennheiser XSW system. Never used in-ears before, so didn't want to blow a huge lump of coin, but also didn't want to go budget crap like XVIVE. Key requirement was having a "focus mix" control where each receiver can have their own blend between 2 signals - enables me to set up a main mix and a separate mix of my bass and click track from sequences and blend between the two as I desire. Anyone else tuning in to my transmitter can just dial in on the main mix. Or buy their own transmitter.
Ok so you are taking TWO mono feeds from 2 UAX sends at FOH and setting up the XSW to send 2 separate MONO channels and then use the PAN capability on the receiver to blend.You're assuming I'm getting or have a monitor console. Nope. This will be a simple monitor mix from the desk aux sends on the FOH console. So the IEMs are just taking place of a wedge, and by running 2 mono sends I can have 2 separate mixes - allowing for another band member to have their own mix from a single transmitter.
First and foremost this will be used in an "acoustic" duo I perform in, but I will also be using it with my band - when we finally start gigging.
Ok so you are taking TWO mono feeds from 2 UAX sends at FOH and setting up the XSW to send 2 separate MONO channels and then use the PAN capability on the receiver to blend.
Got it. That was NOT clear [to me] from your prior posts.![]()
No worries… let us know how it works out!That's the one. Sorry I wasn't clear.
Then I’ll assume you know the answer and you’re purposely being unhelpful.
Posting the same question that's already been answered hundreds of times is not helpful. It's lazy and attention seeking.