• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Bass cables?

Status
Not open for further replies.
eh, not entirely sure. monster claims that their cord specifically for bass sounds better... for low frequencies.

just for insight, if you're planning on getting new cables, go with mogami or monster, it's great to have the lifetime warranty, spend 50$ for a cable that will last the rest of your life assuming the company doesn't die.
 
Well, its all subjective really...

You may think a cable sounds better but your head may just tell you that because its trying to justify the cash you just blew on a monster..(I am taking a psychology class right now and that my friends is called the PLacebo Effect)

I have two monster cables. I regret buying them, very expensive with a great lifetime warranty. No sound difference from a cheap Rapco cable, and it already broke on me. Although the warranty is no questions asked free replacement, it would be nice if it just didnt break in the first place...I wish I had the money to get rid of these things and get some bayous or something else worth the money, because no matter what you read THE JACKS ARE BIGGER ON THESE THINGS!!! the only thing these cables did for my sound was take some of the annoying pops and clicks out, for the most part...because some are still there.

BTW digiflex cables which are made in Canada are crap to me as well. My friend bought me one, and it came broken new. So ya, maybe the bad apple in the bunch, but still doesn't make sense considering it costs 40 bucks!

Andrew

sorry for the rant, but guys remember theres no use fighting over this, everyone is entitled to their opinion as long as its honest and has relevant facts that back it up!:)
 
All I am saying is Sat.When I picked up my TF750 from Dave Funk at Vics home Vic played his basses threw his new TFB750 and a Series 2 Epifani UL 410 with various basses.Nothing was changed on each bass and 3 different cords where used.One I don't remember what it was ,one was a Fodera cord and the other was the one Dave brought along which was a van den Hul.They all sounded different but the van den Hul was way clearer,tighter sounding and punchier over the others and they all high end cords.there was some difference in the lengths.there are difference in cords the same as there is difference in wireless,amps and speakers!
 
The only real difference between cable brands that would make one better than the other comes down to three things:

1) Quality of connectors, cabling and workmanship.
2) Shielding.
3) Warranty.

Back when I was on a budget, I bought some cables from Rondo Music which were 20ft each. A 5 pack ran me $40. Sounds like a deal right? Well, the issues I had with these cables was that quite frankly, they were cheaply made. The connections were not solid at all, and the plug ends jiggled. In the end, I decided that risking gigging with such garbage cables is not something I wanted to do (even with backups) so I relegated them to being made into cheap contact mics for my noise band and replaced the actual cables that I was using to play bass with some Planet Waves. World of difference. The connections actually feel solid, and there's a little less noise coming through.

In my opinion though, if you buy a quality made, shielded cable, paying extra for any audiophile voodoo is dumb. Monster may make quality cables construction-wise but any speak of "more natural bass response" and "articulation" is a bunch of hogwash.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.