• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Bass Chords

Opinions on 2 note bass chords? I often play a note with a fifth thrown in to beef up a particular part (I play with a pick). I think it works because we only have one guitar player and he plays a lot of single note stuff with ample feedback. We're a noisy, mathy, post hardcore kind of thing.
 
I had an engineer at a well respected studio (gold records on the wall and all) tell me that I shouldn't play chords on albums because from an engineering standpoint it creates problems in getting all the frequencies to play nice. I played chords on that album and had no problems and no complaints from him. So IDK... I've been playing them forever and I really like the way they thicken a part up.

Chord on.
 
Actually, two notes can only imply a chord.
Good to see this finally mentioned. A root and a 5th, a root and a 3rd or 10th, etc. are not chords, they are double stops. It takes three different tones to define a chord.

In any case, if you voice them in such a way as to minimize muddiness (such as a root and 10th, or root/5th up the neck a bit - same with 3rd/root in first inversion), they shouldn't cause too much sonic disturbance, if you will.
 
I used to do this quite a bit in a trio during guitar solos. You can pluck the higher note closer to the bridge using pinky or third finger. If you use your thumb, then your first two fingers can play higher notes and again the higher notes can be close to the bridge to help prevent muddiness. Come to think of it I used to do this also in a 3 piece cover band during the guitar solo on "working man."
I play in a five piece these days and there's not any need for me to do this kind of thing anymore.
 
Good to see this finally mentioned. A root and a 5th, a root and a 3rd or 10th, etc. are not chords, they are double stops. It takes three different tones to define a chord.

While you guys are technically correct in terms of classical music theory, in the rock world a double stop is commonly called a "power chord". You can argue that this is wrong, but it seems like a lot of semantics to me.
 
Is it semantics to suggest that misnomers such as that be corrected in a technical forum regarding music?

My point is that it's only a misnomer in the context of classical theory.

The origins of classical music were upper class and white. The origins of rock were working class and racially mixed. While I'm not accusing you of anything, I think that viewed in this light, the insistence that rock musicians use the same terminology as classical musicians takes on some uncomfortable connotations.

I like you FretlessMainly, and I'm not trying to pick a fight with you, and I probably won't post anything else about this, because I don't want this thread to degenerate into an absurd argument with a guy I respect. But for the reasons stated above, I will continue to proudly use terms like "power chord", because I'm a rocker, and I'm proud of that tradition.