• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Bass mods, when does it cross the line?

What do you think of modding basses?

  • if it's your bass do what you want.

    Votes: 461 64.5%
  • Basses should never be modded.

    Votes: 13 1.8%
  • Some basses shouldnt be modded, it harms their value. The rest are fair game.

    Votes: 212 29.7%
  • Mod any bass except...

    Votes: 29 4.1%

  • Total voters
    715
Okay, I think I got it.

So, this is okay:

mikewatt63EB3.jpg


And so's this:

attachment.jpg


Maybe a little much, but still okay:

Link Removed

A rare lefty Rickenbacker?! I guess we'll have to look the other way for Sir Paul:

Screenshot2012-06-13at105657AM.png


And this is obviously an abomination performed by the devil himself:

omUUE.jpg
 
I voted for "if it's your bass do what you want".

Like anything even remotely related to freedom of speech/expression: anyone has the right to mod their bass however they see fit, and I have the right to think they're an idiot if they rout a '59 Precision so they can add a MM pickup.
 
For someone else: Do what you want, it's yours.
For me: Anything non reversible it usually too far.

this pretty much sums it up for me too...

plus the vintage thing. I would not mod anything that was vintage...cause, well, it makes it not vintage anymore. I would "update" vintage to keep it working...like new wiring or cleaning/changing pots etc. But in my mind, a 69 P bass is not supposed to have J pups, 7 strings and fanned frets, a Bad Ass II Bridge, (or worse yet, a whammy bar) flamed burl maple top, and stereo outputs...

NOT that I am saying I don't like these mods on other basses - well except for the fanned frets thing, BUT, just not on that bass.
 
Okay, I think I got it.

So, this is okay:

mikewatt63EB3.jpg


And so's this:

attachment.jpg


Maybe a little much, but still okay:

Link Removed

these mods are bad ass. Mojo mods are totally acceptable to me....PUNK ROCK!

A rare lefty Rickenbacker?! I guess we'll have to look the other way for Sir Paul:

Screenshot2012-06-13at105657AM.png


And this is obviously an abomination performed by the devil himself:

omUUE.jpg

and that is an abomination! Waht WAS that?
 
I freely admit that irreversible mods to vintage bases make me sad inside, and I do think that it's a real idiot move, but I still voted for the "it's yours" option.

You bought it. If you want to burn it onstage or smash it into a million pieces, then that's your prerogative.

For my part, I'd stay away from non-reversibly modding any vintage instrument of value. It's so easy to get repros and custom jobs that there's really no reason to mess with history. That said, the only instruments I have that is truely a old and rare (not counting my original 79 t-40) is a Crown Viola bass that isn't worth much anyway, so take my opinion with a grain.
 
Syco_bass said:
Mod what you want, but, vintage, high valued, original peices shouldn't be modded in my opinion. But then again, opinions are like A** holes. We all have one. LOL.

Cheers.

This. If its replaceable, go for it.

If its something that has value as is, leave it.

Example: I modded the heck out of my Xaviere P-bass. I paid $169, and could easily get another just like it ( before mods).

Before:
2662029b.jpg

First mod:
9d2fba57.jpg

As it is now:
7224620f.jpg


My backup to my main bass is a Dillion 54 P copy. Yup, I modded it. Covers, ashtray, and tolexed the pickguard.

Before:
0c7d8d40.jpg

After:
82c832be.jpg

My main player is a 2011 60th Anniversary P. I won't change a thing, just on the off chance that this model becomes desirable in the future (I'll never sell it, but even so).
288b92db.jpg


Sorry to be so long-winded. This thread needed a few pix anyway.