Make no mistake, I sympathize with the plight of working musicians, and am conscious of not wanting to threaten their livelihood. But I believe the situation is much more complex than saying that hobbyists are ruining it for professionals. Maybe some are, and some aren't. I honestly don't think I've caused any musician to lose real work. I don't take this matter lightly.
In my view, there has always been a time and place for musical performances that are socially or culturally worthwhile but not commercially viable. And not all esoteric music attracts the interest of philanthropists. For some genres, if you want the music to be played, you have to just go out and play it. I'm willing to contribute to those ventures. But I don't play commercial music for free.
Believe me, we're talking about a tiny corner of the music business. In my view, larger factors in the decline of live music are: 1) Volume levels. 2) Internet and televised sports, which have grown exponentially in the past 50 years. That's hard to compete with.
I agree completely.. We're in a period of ENORMOUS change. We now routinely watch people walk into lampposts while staring at a 2 and 1/2 " screen held tightly in their hand and earbuds hanging from their ears. We go to concerts, stand 5 FEET from a Major act.....and watch the entire thing on our phone!!! Speaking ONLY for myself, I have a choice to make, as do you. I can go to an empty venue and watch a couple of guys in Bud light Tee shirts, shorts and sneakers......or I can stay home and watch Paul Carrack on a 2500 watt, 5.1 Home Theater.....while sitting in my bathrobe.....and playing along on my bass. The decision on which to do gets easier and easier to make....all the time. It simply IS what it is. I was fortunate enough to have lived in and been able to participate in the absolute Golden Years of Rock and Roll. I had a BLAST! I wouldn't trade those years for anything. We simply Adapt....or become Irrelevant.