• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Bass Wah Questions

Rather than prattle on and on about my new, custom-made, hand-carved, toucan-beak backplate on my Spector NS-2 with spalted maple top, hand-rubbed oil finish, and a Kahler 2410 tremolo, I would like to present my updates as a critique of my previous post.

Try the Fulltone Clyde Deluxe. It has a really old-school sound (like Hendrix or Cream), but it can get funky with the best of them. It is not "switchless," but the bypass runs marathons around the Dunlop, which I actually quite like. Yeah, I said in my novella, "Who Names Their Kids Clyde Anymore? An Initial Look at the Fulltone Clyde Deluxe Wah," that the 105Q wasn't my favorite, but I had another go with one recently, and I must say that it would make a great SECOND wah for me, but the Fulltone remains my favorite.

My Fulltone is still around, as is a newly-acquired DOD FX-17 Wah/Volume. Good pedals, but the Fulltone has become somewhat...dated...and the DOD is a wah for the really, REALLY unhip. I fit that mold, because I wear baggy pants. I can't pull that super-skinny, hipster jean look off, and I'm better for it. You young 'uns have no idea how ridiculous you look, and yes, you DO care what people think about you.

But, if those two are your only options, get the Dunlop.

My opinion on this issue has not changed. I still say the middle ground, represented by the 105Q, will probably win you more gigs, and is significantly easier to source locally. Yet, I have come to loathe the bypass, and the build quality of Dunlop pedals has declined somewhat in recent years. My friend has broken, through regular, proper use, three standard CryBaby guitar wahs in as many years; I responded by informing him of some other options that begin with the words "Wilson" and "Effects" and "dot" and "com." Yet, somehow, I manage to have only broken one pedal, and it was a Q-Tron. All of the 105Qs I have ever used, and that would be the two I owned, remained perfectly reliable, up through the times I rid myself of them, because their bypass is truly appalling.

The Morley sound, while not terrible, is not one I'm totally in love with anymore.

I've fallen in love with the Morley PWB of yesteryear. I have one; I think it's fantastic. It's big, bulky, and uses a light bulb. It also works as a volume pedal. It has become my favorite wah pedal.

And Snarling Dogs wahs are a joke. I tried a Mold Spore last week, and I will never, EVER buy their products. Poorly made, awful-sounding, and about as wide as a Morley, and twice as tall. It was like wearing platform heels, and I don't swing that way.

Oy, Gott. This is absolutely appalling. I am ashamed of this writing, and I do humbly apologize for insulting your intelligence with this...well, I wouldn't call it purple prose. That, at least, has some inherent humour to it.

Having written that, I find myself in complete agreement with most of this statement. The Mold Spore did have a very mediocre frequency sweep, and it was almost all in the top end, exactly where it doesn't belong. It was built shockingly bad; I expect a plastic Behringer to break; I'm not happy that it, eventually, will break, but at least the $20-35 price tag is fair warning. The Mold Spore cost at least $130, and it was made of metal. Should be a winner, right? Wrong. It was squeaky, and I had absolutely no confidence in the switch. And the store where I tried it shuttered its doors on Jan. 1 this year. Having never liked its selection, which consisted entirely of cheaply-built guitars that even Beijing wouldn't stock, drumsticks, and an Electro-Harmonix Small Stone - The Russian one, not the American - I was not at all upset by its departure. It actually works out for the better, because I can now use its parking spots when I go to the Barrymore.

That, however, should not be a strike against the pedal, but the store does have another branch, on the other side of the city, in one of the absolutely worst possible locations - University Ave. is not so much under construction, as it is gone. Safe to live in, and there is a great grocery store down the street that sells mix-and-match bottles of microbrew, and local cheeses (yes, you do all envy a Wisconsin man this night). It is, as far as I am aware, still open, and they still sell ESP and PRS guitars, Mesa/Boogie amps and Fulltone and Electro-Harmonix effects. It is this very store which veteran TB posters will remember as the store where I purchased the following:

EHX Russian Small Stone and Bassballs
EHX Q-Tron, Bass Micro Synthesizer and Stereo Clone Theory
Fulltone Clyde Deluxe
Line6 AM4. Yes, I have to own up to this, the only trade I truly regret.

This store now carries both Snarling Dogs Mold Spore Psycho-Scumatic wahs from the previous store. They will never sell them, no matter how hard they try.

However, the Snarling Dogs does have some positive qualities:

I own a Morley PWB. I knew full well that it would be enormous. I still use it, knowing that it will probably occupy 45% of a Pedaltrain, Jr. Big pedals no longer bother me, as long as they are built well. I run into similar issues at work (substitute "Morley PWB" with "any UPS Toshiba or Mitsubishi make," and "Mold Spore" with "Powerware 9335," and you have my "job" instead of my "personal interest"). It is longer, I believe, than my Morley, but I haven't used on in some time, and I can't be bothered to try it again, so don't hold me to that. As for the platform heels jibe, I am probably the last person on Earth who should be dispensing shoe advice; I wear through a pair in less than a year. Yes, being overweight does probably take three months off of my shoe life, but when I was thinner, I used to go through a pair in a year. I hate these damned orthotic inserts.

The ring modulator is operated with an expression pedal that isn't detachable from the unit. This means that you do not have to buy a separate expression pedal. This saves you both money and real estate. This is a very, very positive quality, indeed.

It is powered by a standard Boss-type 9v, center negative barrel-type power adapter. Good on them for the standardization.

There. That's much better. It now makes less sense than it did before. But, it is written slightly better.
 
I've played with a Morley and a 105Q, but I have to say that the Wilson Freaker Wah (based on the tychobrahe parapedal) has absolutely ended ALL GAS for any other wahs. It has a HUGE bottom end, and a really cool sweeping tone that almost sounds halfway between a wah and a phaser/univibe. It really is fantastic, and NAILS that old-school psychadelic tone.
 
I'm looking at getting a wah too soon - was looking at these two + the EBS Wah One.

Anyone have experience of the EBS? It any good? I love every EBS pedal I've tried (I need to get a few more for my board)...

If you're already familiar with EBS pedals, you'll absolutely love this one! I A/B tested it with the Stanley Clarke signature also, and dug the Wah-one way more (less funky, but way more dirty & felt like more solid construction overall). It can be used as a sort of envelope filter also, plus I really use the volume-pedal function a lot on acoustic bass gigs... But the other week I still had it on wahwah, and made the sound engineer totally freak out (running to the FOH board like it was on fire ; - ) so that also worked! I can't compare them to any other pedals, but they never appealed to me since I never bought one... Until the Wah-One came around!
 
I've played with a Morley and a 105Q, but I have to say that the Wilson Freaker Wah (based on the tychobrahe parapedal) has absolutely ended ALL GAS for any other wahs. It has a HUGE bottom end, and a really cool sweeping tone that almost sounds halfway between a wah and a phaser/univibe. It really is fantastic, and NAILS that old-school psychadelic tone.

If I didnt have my weeping demon I'd go this,... this pedal souns nutso :D
 
Im about to swap my CS3 with my guitarist for his weeping demon, i dont use the CS3 much, and its a good deal for the both of us. What does everyone think? If i dont like it on my bass board, im sure it will end up on my guitar board, or sold on :P

I like the idea of having all the extra controls depending on what instrument you want to use it for.
 
i used a weeping demon for a while, thought it was great considering the price (seem to remember paying £40 sterling for it) pretty versatile wah.. much preffered it over the morley i had..
turn the 2 internal trimpots(access is under the silver tape on the underside of the pedal,you will need a SMALL screwdriver though!) fully clockwise to further enhance the bass/treble ; )
 
I use the Morley DBW. Unfortunately, I've no experience with other wahs. I don't do "waka waka" stuff. Instead, I do long controlled sweeps and the DBW has been delivering the goods. If there's a better pedal for doing long controlled sweeps, I'd like to know about it tho.
 
For what it is worth, the 105Q is currently sitting on my "at home" pedal board. I just don't use it very much in a band setting. However, I really enjoy pulling it out during jam sessions and pushing a little distortion through it. Lots of fun.

When I posted this thread (two years ago?) I thought I would have more use for it. Instead, it came off my pedal board and was replaced by an envelope filter... which is much more my style.

I won't sell it. One of these days I'm going to start a funk band and try to use it....