WHAT?!?!?!?
Have you ever played a Thunderbird, A Ripper, A G3, A RD Artist, A Les Paul bass? You must be jumping on the band wagon with people because all these basses provide great lows and great highs. The only Gibson basses that were "MUD" were the EB basses, Because of the Big Bucker right at the neck. The EB-3 had the bridge pickup which helped even out the sound, But its still muddy from what Ive heard.
Ive owned a Ripper and currectly have a Thunderbird as my main bass. The Ripper to me, Was like a P bass, but just with more "umph" and volume. Aid buy one again before a Pbass anyday. My Thunderbird is just "IN YOUR FACE", Its got amazing low end (clear low end too) and very good treble, its not at rickenbacker status but its not "MUD" at all. Infact, Nothing about the bass would make you think mud.
Ive only played the Les Paul bass and only heard the RD Artist. The Les Paul is similar to the Thunderbird in sound, But not exactly. Ive only played an early '90's one (With the Bartolini's), But I can definitely say it ws As in you r face as my Thunderbird.
There are a few guys on here who owned or still have a RD and From what ive heard them say, the bass is great. And from the songs Ive heard the bass on, I can say that It sounds good with a band and cuts through the mix well.
Please tell me you had a bad experience or where just jumping on the wagon. Because That comment sounded very close minded.