• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

BBE Sonic Maximizer Yeh or Neh?

I used SM400s and SM900s for years in rehearsal spaces and on backlines, and I can't see how using a BBE will get you to that tone. I did have access to and tried BBE processors over the years and never really felt they helped - and I've got fairly hi-fi basses.

The baked in preamp tone of the Fusion 500 may even fight the BBE a little bit. Isn't that amp designed to mimic that tube sag and saturation which goes against everything the SM series SS amps stood for? I would think a better option would be one of the older RB heads, instead.

I think some BBE processors were a bit of a tone-suck when bypassed or "off" too. So there's that as well.
I know a lot of people who swore by BBE processors dumped them as soon as they saw/heard Hartke XL cabinets because those gave them much more punch than the BBE processor could ever give them.

It's kinda weird reading about these now - in 2020 - I remember they were all the rage years ago with people trying them in home-stereos, PA systems, and I think there was even a tiny BBE processor you could link into your car stereo for a time. Wow... memories.
 
Last edited:
I have both the pedal version (Sonic stomp) and a 2-channel rack version.
Whatever it does, I like it. I guess you could think of it as a very broad eq.
In general, I like what the 'lo contour' does to sounds, sort of thickens the bottom end.
The 'process' knob, I use sparingly. I try to keep it around 9am below sometimes, I feel it 'smears' the high midrange too much if I go near the noon position or beyond.
On bass, I hear it does more than an eq would to help the lower notes ring out clearer, not necessarily louder
 
When I was developing studio rack mount gear we did a full evaluation of the Sonic Maximizer. It is a high frequency expander that boosts MORE as you feed it more highs and can push your highs up to +26 dB! That is a crazy amount and can cause headroom problems. There is so much HF boost that they had to add some bass boost to the later models so it didn't sound too thin. If there are no highs to boost, It can't do much.

The Aural Exciter, on the other hand, does not do EQ, but makes NEW harmonics from your existing sound. Kind of a subharmonic synthesizer in reverse. If your sound is dull it can brighten it up, making new highs.
 
I used SM400s and SM900s for years in rehearsal spaces and on backlines, and I can't see how using a BBE will get you to that tone. I did have access to and tried BBE processors over the years and never really felt they helped - and I've got fairly hi-fi basses.

The baked in preamp tone of the Fusion 500 may even fight the BBE a little bit. Isn't that amp designed to mimic that tube sag and saturation which goes against everything the SM series SS amps stood for? I would think a better option would be one of the older RB heads, instead.

I think some BBE processors were a bit of a tone-suck when bypassed or "off" too. So there's that as well.
I know a lot of people who swore by BBE processors dumped them as soon as they saw/heard Hartke XL cabinets because those gave them much more punch than the BBE processor could ever give them.

It's kinda weird reading about these now - in 2020 - I remember they were all the rage years ago with people trying them in home-stereos, PA systems, and I think there was even a tiny BBE processor you could link into your car stereo for a time. Wow... memories.
MEMORIES!
tenor.gif
 
For a pbass or a passive jazz, yes. With my lakland 5502, only when i want to solo over the soloing guitarist. ;)
I was wondering just what the "general consensus" is here on TB as far as the BBE Sonic Maximizer (or the Aural Exiter) goes. I have a Gallien Krueger Fusion 550 and I Love the versatility and tones I can get from just this one amp head; BUT, no one amp can "do it all"; so I heard mention (somewhere here on TB) that the particular tone I was "chasing"/after SWR (SM400) could be had by simply adding in a Sonic Maximizer and it'll get me "in the ballpark" of that particular tone. They're really not that expensive, but I wanted to see/hear what some others here have to say about them Good or Bad. I figure if I came get close to that tone for ? $150 (or less used) it may be well worth it. Thoughts? Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
I had one for a while, and used it on the p.a. mostly. But, over the years of setting up the p.a., it took only an extra minute or two to get pretty much the same sound without the BBE. I really thought it sounded better playing back recorded music than playing live music.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
Back in the old rack days I was using the BBE compressor with a maximizer built in. Sounded pretty good with just a touch blended in. I used to use one channel for bass and one for lead vox into our crappy pa. Not as good as today's gear, not even close. My guitarist still uses a stomp on his board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
BBE and Aphex ( Big Bottom ) are very similar. You will digit for a couple days and then on the shelve it goes like mine. Kind of a toyish sound with the highs and lows adjustable. DJ's were big into these years back in the clubs.
Worked pretty well for that. For the young players, the Aphex aural exciter was only for rent in studios. You could not buy them. Puts a glassy sound / life- on the vocals and Mix. Now for $ 150.00 you can buy the same thing. Sound has come a long way. Not to say its unusable, but many have given you the same info? Buy it from GC ?? and if you don't like return it for something better ?
 

Latest posts