One trick "P"ony? That's how I voted but not how I feel. My P's have several usefull tones, at least as many as any Sadowsky, Lakland, Roscoe, Nordstrand, Fbass, Elrick, Sukop etc. etc. I've owned.
Really all I need in any song is a thick, meaty tone, a more focused, Jazz type tone, or occasionally a decent solo tone (all of which a good P or J can get you). When I was buying bell's and whistle basses, I convinced myself I needed basses which could cop tones from Beatles to Cult to Sabbath to Collective Soul and so on and so on. I was convinced each song's bass tone had to sound like the original recording. More bridge PUP here, more treble there, more mid-range on that one. Then we did some live recordings, some songs sounded great, on some the bass was weak, or just a buzz. Or you couldn't even tell that this one had 1/16th more bridge PUP than that one, or that one slightly favored the neck PUP with just a little more low-mids. So unless you are recording in a studio, IMO, all you need are a couple of good tones that still fill out the bottom end.
Really all I need in any song is a thick, meaty tone, a more focused, Jazz type tone, or occasionally a decent solo tone (all of which a good P or J can get you). When I was buying bell's and whistle basses, I convinced myself I needed basses which could cop tones from Beatles to Cult to Sabbath to Collective Soul and so on and so on. I was convinced each song's bass tone had to sound like the original recording. More bridge PUP here, more treble there, more mid-range on that one. Then we did some live recordings, some songs sounded great, on some the bass was weak, or just a buzz. Or you couldn't even tell that this one had 1/16th more bridge PUP than that one, or that one slightly favored the neck PUP with just a little more low-mids. So unless you are recording in a studio, IMO, all you need are a couple of good tones that still fill out the bottom end.