I've always been a big fan of using two of the same speakers with two cab set-ups.
I have two HS210s on the way, so I'm about to experience this first hand
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I've always been a big fan of using two of the same speakers with two cab set-ups.
I have two HS210s on the way, so I'm about to experience this first hand![]()
Thanks, KJung!
I'm moving from a Schroeder 21012L, a 410L, via an aborted attempt to get some DR Bass cabs (VERY long story!).
I luckily ended up with an HS410 and - compared to what I've had in the past - it was like someone had lifted a blanket from my cab. Even with the horn rolled off, as I prefer. I've never heard anything like it. Amazing.
I'm not a Hi-Fi guy, but I do like warmth and definition and this cab is in a different league. Everyone in the band noticed right away.
I'm moving to the HS210s because they have a height advantage (I'll still be stacking them 'correctly' mind you), and, from what I've read, an added bonus may be that the bottom end may be a little rounder. If not, no problem as the HS410 is warm enough.
It's amazing how Jim has managed to get that kind of tone out of cabs so shallow!
In an ideal world, I'd like an NV215 or NV610, but they cost an arm and a leg over here. These cabs will be a great compromise, I'm sure!
Not that 'Berg' and 'Compromise' should be mentioned in the same sentence...![]()
I would agree that 2 x Gjr's could be fine and would put out more volume than any single 210, but a single Gjr. versus an HT210s... not in my experience. I just feel those GJrIII's were horrible, and were the only cabs I've ever had 'fart' at low volumes with even a touch of low end. IMO. I liked the tone a lot, just not the performance regarding volume. I believe that's the same cab as the redhead combo, which was also awful IMO.
I would agree that 2 x Gjr's could be fine and would put out more volume than any single 210, but a single Gjr. versus an HT210s... not in my experience. I just feel those GJrIII's were horrible, and were the only cabs I've ever had 'fart' at low volumes with even a touch of low end. IMO. I liked the tone a lot, just not the performance regarding volume. I believe that's the same cab as the redhead combo, which was also awful IMO.
I would agree that 2 x Gjr's could be fine and would put out more volume than any single 210, but a single Gjr. versus an HT210s... not in my experience. I just feel those GJrIII's were horrible, and were the only cabs I've ever had 'fart' at low volumes with even a touch of low end. IMO. I liked the tone a lot, just not the performance regarding volume. I believe that's the same cab as the redhead combo, which was also awful IMO.
I meant a single Jr. beats the HT210S in low end and overall volume.
I had one of each in the rehearsal studio. I could hear myself w/ the Jr. and had more low end, and the HT210S didn't cut the mustard. The HT210S sounds better to me when I can hear it though - esp the tweeter.
The Jr. definitely has more mid response, and higher SPL. But man, put some watts into that HT210s and it's no contest.
If you dig the Jr's, that's cool. I was actually disappointed in the performance of that cab (given how much I liked the GIII 410). I do love the GIII, but just found the GIII Jr. very weak in true low end and absolute volume.
I guess I can see if you were only putting, for example, a couple hundred watts into each one and not really pushing the volume, that the GIII Jr. could actually sound more present and forward, and louder at the same setting. Other than that... not so much.