TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
the 410he tonally is pretty much a 810e cut in half, in fact we a/b the 410he and 810e in the studio and mic signals sound the same. Ive been using the 410he full time for about 3 years and owned a 810e for a decade before that. the ampeg classic series has been produced in several factories and even countries over the years but in some years the 410he actually has the exact same speakers as the 810e. no one says the 810 sounds thin or that its a top cab. Its just a different voicing than ported cabs. I play 5 string in standard beadg and drop aeadg through this cab. IMO the only negative about it and the reason for most of the bad reviews the cab gets is its an 8ohm cab. a lot of times people don't realize because its 8 ohms instead of 4 ohms that their amp is likely working really hard while under powering the cab. For power I use a crown 1500 xls bridged to power the 410he and I push it pretty hard. most of the bad reviews are people using 350w or 500w at 4ohm heads, so the reality is those small amps are only putting out like 150-250W at 8 ohms into a cab that wants at least double that power to be happy. basically you need a rig that can potentially power an 810 happily to get the best out of the 410he. As far as lows if you're the type of player that uses relatively flat eq for rock or metal than its works fine, if your one who boost lows a lot to play styles like reggae or hip hop its probably not the best choice.
Can anyone tell me what I might be missing out on by plugging directly into my Focusrite interface? The tone I get is adequate for home recording and with proper tweaking, things sound just fine. I just wonder if investing in a proper DI is really worth it. Recording drums is where the real trouble comes along... But that's for a different forum.
Thanks, thats a very helpful response. And you're completely right about the power issue. These speakers need to be properly supported.
Crowns are excellent. My Power amp is 2k at 2ohm and at 8 is 800 which should be plenty to have a hold of the cab.
Interesting that they sound the same when mic'd up.
Think I will give one a try...![]()
What my band did recently for our upcoming single is just DI the bass with a Countryman 85. Then use the Wave's Renaissance Bass plug-in to get super deep bottom low end. That's followed by a duplicate track of the bass EQed to only have Mids and in them. That track is then run through an overdrive in Guitar Rig. You blend all that together and you get a crazy aggressive but punchy bass tone.
There's a lot you can do with software these days
I tried using a SM57 on BRX but didn't like the results. The method described above worked best for.
Yay! Start clean!
Countryman type 85 rules, and can be found at steep discounts.

Yup! The countryman is my go to DI. I got it for under $100 on ebay. It pays for itself every time I record.
Some people do not like it for active basses but I haven't had a problem with how either a passive or active bass sounds through it.
Been doing this a long time and I have never recorded using an amp or speakers.
Every electric bass recording I was paid for either used a DI (radial, countryman, avalon pre), or DI'd and at the same time mic'd via an ampeg tube amp. In every case, the tube amp tracks were discarded. Really.
Upright recordings have never used an amp of any kind, or a pick-up.
Been doing this a long time and I have never recorded using an amp or speakers.
Every electric bass recording I was paid for either used a DI (radial, countryman, avalon pre), or DI'd and at the same time mic'd via an ampeg tube amp. In every case, the tube amp tracks were discarded. Really.
My paid upright recordings have never used an amp of any kind, or a pick-up.