TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
+1. Your poll list would need to have well over 100 bassists on it, unless you wanted to narrow it down by genre. :scowl:
Hmmm ... which is more lame; this oh-no-not-again thread or the oh-no-not-again anti-Flea comments?
So anyway, how are we judging art these days, by who can run the fastest or who can jump the highest ?!?![]()
I've always thought that Mark King was a really underrated, fantastic bass player.
Who do you believe is the best bassist ever?
It's not disrespecting Flea's contribution to his band or his influence on a generation of kids to suggest that he doesn't belong anyhwere near a list like this.
You know... it's so simple for musicians on other instruments to come together and make this sort of judgement based on technique, which is a bit more objective than basing it on musical appeal. But when bassists try to do it, it gets bogged down by folks who haven't figured out that their favorite pop/rock/metal tunes might not require anything special in the way of training.
I mean, I love U2, but wouldn't put Clayton, Edge or Mullen on any "greatest musicians" list.

The revered players on just about every other instrument are revered for their technique and talent, but guitarists and bassists are judged by record sales and tattoos.
I guess it's a by-product of the "Go to a pawn shop, buy a Strat/P-Bass, learn three chords, fling your hair around and you're a musician" mentality of electric solidbody sales marketing, but I'll never understand how it flies on a website dedicated to the craft of bass playing.

Sorry, it clearly *is* disrespectful, intentionally or otherwise. Surely the contribution of any musician in a band *to* that band is one of the most important aspects of what they do? Often arguably more so for a bassist? And isn't influence a considerable mark of a player's significance? And, incidentally, with a career and rep stretching well over 20 years, Flea's influence has been on considerably more than one generation of 'kids'.
Look, 'Best of' lists are always a bad idea.
Someone else here has suggested that the only way a topic like this has any chance of working is to split it into genre which makes sense - unless you're genuinely of the mind that Victor Wooten could successfully front Motorhead ..?![]()
What, no Danny Bonadouche?
Flea's in what was once a kindasorta funk band.
There's nothing he does that hasn't been done better by literally hundreds of bassists in R&B bands playing small clubs and bassists in small Southern Protestant storefront churches. Nothing.
He is to funk what Kenny G is to jazz.
Woot can't successfully front Motorhead because his voice is different from Lemmy's and because rock is all about image.
Image.
Im.
Age.
Lemmy doesn't play -has never in his life played- anything Victor Wooten can't. The reverse is definitely not true.
), that Wooten never would have. Incidentally, although his music is not to my taste, I certainly respect and admire Wooten's jaw-dropping technique.I'm simply asking that we respect our instrument.