TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
that's a good point.
I searched the specs of some models and the Carvin looks a much better option cost/benefit than shure:
Shure PSM 200: ($600)
Audio Frequency Response: 30 Hz to 12 kHz (+/–3 dB); earphone dependent
Signal-to-Noise Ratio 80 dB typical (A-weighted)
Total Harmonic Distortion (1 kHz) <1.5% typical (Ref. ±35 kHz deviation)
Audio-Technica M2 and M3 ($600 - $800)
Frequency Response 60 Hz to 13 kHz (±3 dB)
Dynamic Range 90 dB (typical), A-weighted
Total Harmonic Distortion <1% (at 1 kHz, ±20 kHz Deviation)
Carvin EM900 ($350)
Frequency Response: 30Hz - 15kHz (-3dB)
S/N Ratio: 80 dB (A weighted)
Galaxy Audio AS900 ($200)
Audio Frequency Response: +/-3dB 80Hz~16KHz
Dynamic Range: >90dB A-weighted
Total Harmonic Distortion: +/-30KHz deviation 1KHz tone <1%
Sennheiser EW300G3 ($1000)
Frequency response 25.....15000 Hz
Signal-to-noise ratio > 90 dB(A)
THD, total harmonic distortion < 0,9 %
Ok on the same topic guys... what is the cheapest transmitter a band can get away with? I have friends using the Shure Pm200 which goes for $600 new is there anything below that price point that is good enough for guys who are staying on stage no more than 50 feet from the source?
I'm fickle though and those 1964's are pretty interesting. Anyone compared them and the JH16's?
But his comments were that 1964 ears had "just as good, if not better" build quality and far better clarity and overall sound. Not sure how they would stack up to the 16s though. If you're looking at the 16s, I'd suggest checking out the new 1964 ears V6-s model. I know they offer demo units with a modest deposit.I broke down and picked up a pair of Westone UMX3's for a good deal and I'm slowly getting used to them over the Atrios. The bug difference is wayyyy more mids than the Atrios. Not so much on the bottom end but it is still decent just not as hyped up. I might have to EQ some of the mids out because everything just sounds so middy and burpy that it's a bit tough to get the clarity I want.
They are much more sensitive to the smallest volume changes so I've had to do quite a bit of tweaking to my mix. Also I had to change from having a different feed in each ear to a dual mono. Had been running the bass feed in one ear and the aux mix in the other but I had to combine them it just sounded kind of hollow. This is my first experience with "real" IEM's all I've used the last 2 1/2 years are the Atrios.
I also ordered a set of mixed tips to try and the ones I like the best are the red Star tips. Also they fit over the ears a lot better than the Atrios and feel more solid overall and the cable is way better.
Oh I was more than happy with the Atrios but they're discontinued now I didn't want to be stuck without anything on the road. We play 3-5 nights a week 3-4 sets a night so they get a lot of use. Even though I take really good care of them they will eventually break or wear out. I will keep them as a backup.
You can still find stock of them from online retailers if you wanted to buy a backup pair.
I ended up buying 1964's V6-Stage IEMs and really like them. They sound very balanced with lots of low-end booty.
I really want a pair of these but struggle dropping that much coin.