500 watts is honestly way overkill for the spots I play, and I love my Traynor Smallblock 200. Got it used at L&M for cheap. Plenty of sauce to power either or both of Hartke XL cabs, a 210 and a 115. All the features of the 500 too.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Most of the combos use either the B&O ICE or the Hypex amp module. I know that Peavey designed their own for the MiniMega, I think that there are others that have as well, but that's the exception, not the rule.
Hey B-string, It's not that we refuse independent testing. We simply think that using average and peak measurements for power ratings creates a lot of confusion. The Tone Hammer 350 and 500 use the ICE Power 125 and 250. You can get 350 watts continuous from the TH 350 and 500 watts continuous from the TH 500. Continuous is well defined by the FTC so that there is no confusion. You measure full bandwidth at full output for five minutes minimum without shut downs. Very simple. In reality, you can do this test on our amps and they will work indefinitely under these conditions.
best power section.
Yah, too many horror stories of ICE modules shutting down at a gig for any of that specmanship crap to fly. I know my TH-350 can run on "11" forever and that's reason #2 I bought it - reason #1 is its awesome overdrive, > 90% of an SVT's tone at 3 poundsHey B-string, It's not that we refuse independent testing. We simply think that using average and peak measurements for power ratings creates a lot of confusion. The Tone Hammer 350 and 500 use the ICE Power 125 and 250. You can get 350 watts continuous from the TH 350 and 500 watts continuous from the TH 500. Continuous is well defined by the FTC so that there is no confusion. You measure full bandwidth at full output for five minutes minimum without shut downs. Very simple. In reality, you can do this test on our amps and they will work indefinitely under these conditions.
.Actually I heared tell it's mostly that the TH-350 uses the ICE module that others push to 5-600 watts and the TH-500 the module others push to 900 watts. I don't need them fake watts overheating my amp at a gig and/or making my tone un-solid. Aguilar really "gets" bassMy comment was on the Aguilar guy saying that they can run their amp, full spectrum, full load without shut down--- most of that is due to heat management.
Actually I heared tell it's mostly that the TH-350 uses the ICE module that others push to 5-600 watts and the TH-500 the module others push to 900 watts. I don't need them fake watts overheating my amp at a gig and/or making my tone un-solid. Aguilar really "gets" bass. OTOH I do like my GK MB200 and Shuttle 3.0 for what they are too - very different tones though, the former kinda vintage Acoustic-ish and the latter brutally honest.
Actually I heared tell it's mostly that the TH-350 uses the ICE module that others push to 5-600 watts and the TH-500 the module others push to 900 watts. I don't need them fake watts overheating my amp at a gig and/or making my tone un-solid. Aguilar really "gets" bass. OTOH I do like my GK MB200 and Shuttle 3.0 for what they are too - very different tones though, the former kinda vintage Acoustic-ish and the latter brutally honest.
500 watts is usually plenty, agreed. So you might wonder why someone who plays an Aguilar TH500 would want more... I have three cabs--two 8 ohm cabs rated at 400w and one 4 ohm cab rated at 800w. With the TH500 it sometimes will clip with these cabs, which means that there is not enough headroom. The tone loses some clarity when you push the amp really hard like that, so it would be better to have more available power. I would also love to have the ability to go down to 2 ohms so I can use these cabs together. I have an Acoustic Image amp and it does what I need, especially great for upright, I just also really like the Aguilar sound--especially for electric bass. I would love to see Aguilar come out with an amp that rivals the GK MB Fusion 800 in terms of power with full tube preamp, and lightweight (not a sled like the DB750), and with the ability to go down to 2 ohms. I like GK stuff too, but it's so much brighter than the Aguilar stuff, which has a warmth and vintage growl that I like.500 watts is honestly way overkill for the spots I play, and I love my Traynor Smallblock 200. Got it used at L&M for cheap. Plenty of sauce to power either or both of Hartke XL cabs, a 210 and a 115. All the features of the 500 too.
Maybe, but in the unlikely event that his external preamp fails, he has the top's preamp as a "spare", which is nice.Maybe I'm misinterpreting the question...but if you're going to use a pre-amp other than what's in the micro-head, wouldn't it make more sense (and be a lot cheaper) to just use a decent class D poweramp like a Crown XLS?
There is always thatMaybe, but in the unlikely event that his external preamp fails, he has the top's preamp as a "spare", which is nice.
500 watts is usually plenty, agreed. So you might wonder why someone who plays an Aguilar TH500 would want more... I have three cabs--two 8 ohm cabs rated at 400w and one 4 ohm cab rated at 800w. With the TH500 it sometimes will clip with these cabs, which means that there is not enough headroom...
Brilliant concept - use a GK 1 U MB as a power amp for an external preamp! How do you do that specifically? Run a line from the Eden preamp to one of the patch bay connections or the headphones connections?I've driven the power section of my GK MB800 with an Eden Navigator preamp. Worked really well. GK's have a great power section.