• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Beta-57 and Dyn-B compared

PB+J

PB+J

Mar 9, 2000
1,647
153
arlington va
#1
Ok, here's a clip, with all the intonation horrors and tempo screwups, of me hacking through a B-flat blues. I recorded the Schertler Dyn-B and the Shure Beta-57 simultaneously, direct into a Mackie Onyx satellite and then into Logic Pro--no eq or anything else. The Shure is set up Chris Fitzgerald-style.

Forgive the playing.

First the Dyn B

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Then the Shure Beta 57

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

The Shure has more "air" and sounds sweeter overall, but the Dyn-B has more bass response, and in some ways is closer to what I want to sound like. A little judicious eq could get some air into that Dyn-B signal, maybe
 
#2
Great test , the Beta 57 just sounds amazing.
Ive been using it lately , and i definetly think its comperable to many good condenser mics. It is very defined and really detailed sounding. Sweet tone.
 
#3
PB+J said:
The Shure has more "air" and sounds sweeter overall, but the Dyn-B has more bass response, and in some ways is closer to what I want to sound like. A little judicious eq could get some air into that Dyn-B signal, maybe
Click to expand...
Hey bro. When the DYN-B track started off, I thought "Whoa, that's pretty nice." You definitely have it working better on your bass than I did on mine during my little trial.

Like I think you were saying, it does sound better to me in the lower register than up high. In the upper register, it does start to sound more like a pickup, but still with a somewhat more resonant sound than I typically think of from a p/u.

Where did you have the Shure placed? It sounds more natural, but a maybe little thin to me.

I am not sure you can inject "air" into the sound via EQ, but if you figger it out, lemme know pal.
 
#4
I sometimes think bass players would be better off with one of the DYN series made for other instruments, like the one for guitar, which rolls off the low frequencies. I think it sounds pretty dern good on my bass, but like you noticed the weakness is in the highs. I still like the highs better than any piezo I've ever used, but the beta-57 is much better than either. I actually liked the standard SM-57 a little better than the beta, but the beta has a tighter cardioid pattern
 
#7
Without any EQ, I'd rate them about even, altough the Beta was a little bright. When I rolled back the mids and highs a bit (my computer is hooked up to a Yamaha mixer with 3 band EQ), I liked the Beta much better. I only thought to do this because that's the way I set the EQ on the Focus with the mic. When I tried to roll of some of the "zing" from the Dyn-B, it kind of hollowed out the sound. Either way, both sound pretty good. Wish I could have gotten a clean signal out of the Dyn-B on my bass.
 
#8
Yup, well said. In my case, I tend to try moving the mic around looking for the most balanced and natural sound instead of turning EQ knobs. That's why I asked about mic placement. Easy to do with the AMT or the H-clamp - hard to do with rubber bands 'tween the legs.

I know - turning EQ knobs is probably much easier. But I am fascinated sometimes by how many differents tonal variances you can pick up with a mic (no pun intended) by trying different locations, distances from the table, angle of the head to the table, on and on. Probably a combination of the two approaches makes the most sense.

Thanks for taking the time to create and post the A/B test PB+J.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back