OK, this is a topic that has puzzled me for a long long time, and it was brought up
on this thread.
As the one who apparently (and unwittingly) provoked this line of discussion & debate, allow me to weigh in:
So, in closing, just because White did not go in the same direction as Bruford, and doesn't have the huge library of work, does that mean he sucks when compared to him or that he's a lesser drummer?
First of all, I've been a huge Yes fan since 1974. I've heard ALL the albums, many, many times. Have seen Yes play live probably eight times (all with Alan White on drums). And I've also met Alan White in person, and I agree wholeheartedly: He's a very friendly, unpretentious, down-to-earth human being - who also happens to be a very good drummer (I have no idea where the "Alan White sucks" rubbish comes from).
That said, he's still no Bill Bruford - because nobody but BB is a Bill Bruford. Among his many other attributes, Bruford is that rare musician who is able to bring an extremely well-developed technical capability - not to mention a deep wellspring of innovation and creativity - fully and completely into service
of the music. As a result, early Yes was a much better band than it could ever have been without Bruford. He was "instrumental" (pardon the pun) in putting Yes on the map. And when he left the band, Yes was forced to simplify its style somewhat in order to accommodate Alan White. Because Alan White is "inferior" to Bill Bruford, only in the same way that nearly
all other drummers are "inferior" to him.
To put it another way, it's like saying Paul McCartney or Mark King sucks because he's not the player that Victor Wooten is.
I for one am not saying that - or anything like that. Not at all.
Yeah, but think of it another way - there are a lot of guys who can play the bass lines that Chris Squire created - but they're not Chris Squire. To be able to perform the lines is a whole other beast than the creativity to develop them in the first place.
Everybody, including the two of them, have always said that Bruford is first and foremost a jazz drummer and White was always a rock drummer. Bruford's jazz drumming wasn't just good - the thing was that, in the context of the rest of the band, it was part of making early Yes sound like nothing else that was out there. White is a great drummer but the drum parts he created (Relayer, Going for the One, etc. down to the present) don't have that same uniqueness to them.
Exactly right. In fact, for those who say that Alan White is a better fit for modern day Yes, I would suggest that Yes probably had to change its style somewhat -
in order to adapt to Alan's more conventional rock style of drumming, just as it had to change its style
a whole lot more later on, in order to adapt to Trevor Rabin's more straightforward, hard rock style of guitar playing. (By the same token, Trevor Rabin is an excellent rock guitarist. But he's no Steve Howe.)
Under these circumstances, OF COURSE Alan is a better fit for contemporary Yes - because Alan himself greatly influenced the change in style that made himself a better fit for it!
MM