TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yes, you are absolutely correctNot true. The difference is the entire neck, not just the fingerboard. It's very possible that a difference in tone between the two samples is because of the neck wood, not the fingerboard wood. The neck wood (non-fingerboard) does have more mass than the fingerboard.
To put it another way: it's wrong to assume that two chunks of wood of the same species must have the same tone.
To nitpick even further: were the neck screws torqued equally in both instances?![]()
Interesting test, regardless!![]()
)Why did you choose AllParts over USACG and Warmoth? Anybody else have an opinion on the three?
The fact that the guesses are divided nearly 50/50 argues strongly that the emperor is buck *&%$ing naked, LOL.
Perhaps the zing might be brought out more if the playing was a bit more aggressive?
Tbh i've always thought the material of the frets would make more difference to the tone than the wood. Body woods make a very clear difference though. However I don't ever say I want *insert body wood here* on my next bass. I tend to play basses for whatever sounds good, feels nice and is built well.