• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Block inlays vs. Dots

Block Inlay vs. Dots


  • Total voters
    435
With all the discussion I've read on this forum about how different material/wood affect tone, it occured to me that a block marker is quite a bit bigger compared to the usual 'dot' or nothing at all on the board face. That being obvious, would this not affect the tone unless of course the block was merely paint or stained on. ???? I myself am quite happy with just dots.
 
I think binding and blocks are more accepted by the bass playing community than the guitar playing community simply because of what era the blocks can tie the instrument to.

AFAIK - most of the big block inlays on guitars happened in the 80s - when guitars on the whole started to become angular and non-standard - so the customization of bound and blocked guitars - makes it a less likely choice simply due to the era of association.

ON the other hand - the bass playing community as grown exponentially in its liking of classic 70s bass styling - and the bound blocked look - especially the black on maple bound blocked look - plays a significant role in identifying or tying ANY boud and blocked instrument to that era - and also to the 60s fender customs jazzes. you get cool points.

I'm sure if everyone on a whole agreed that 70s styling was atrocious - we'd see a lot less bound and blocked basses out there.

Case in point - neon pink guitars and basses. I think it's easily to say that the flourescent look of the 80s isn't coming back in mass just yet - but who knows.
 
I freakin' hate blocks.

Gaudy. Gaudy. Gaudy.

Go good with Herb Tarlek's suits...

herbtarlek.jpg


[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

decemberpntrace11.jpg


rpm_g_bonner_400.jpg


6a00e54f9c23f2883301053600f30a970b-150wi.jpg


herb_tarlek.jpg