• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Bolt-on or neck through... which do you prefer?

Which style neck do you like better, and why?

  • Neck-through

    Votes: 37 19.7%
  • Bolt-on

    Votes: 107 56.9%
  • Carrots

    Votes: 44 23.4%

  • Total voters
    188
Ordinarily I prefer neck-through or at least set-neck for 5-string basses, for the note definition and sustain. On these basses the attack is mostly a little burst of treble and a bit of broad-spectrum thump. This construction also tends to compress a bit, making it easier to play.

But! For 4-string I'm leaning more toward the bolt-on thing, at least if it's well built. The attack is more of a volume envelope thing rather than 'just' some treble. Like a little burp at the start of each note, which I think it why some people say bolt-ons are punchier.

I haven't found many 5-strings that work as well in bolt-on. The problem isn't just the B string, it's the feel of the whole bass. So at this stage if I'm attempting the virtuoso thing it's usually going to be on a set-neck or through-neck bass, but I think any 4-string I buy will be fender-style for the foreseeable future.
 
I don't have enough experience building or playing a variety of basses to have an opinion.

But, I have talked to a very experienced builder (name withheld) and he says that with a neck through, the wood can get harmonics that are as long as the vibrating strings, setting up situations where you can have tones canceled out if the string vibration and body vibration are out of pahse. (I wonder then could you also have situations where certain tones are amplified if the string and body vibration are in phase?)

So his theory is that a bolt on neck creates two shorter sets of harmonics, one in the body and one (of a different length) in the neck, so that you avoid that cancelation of harmonics.

This may account for the reputaion that the bolt on seems to have for punch and the neck thru has for sustain.

The builder I know who prefers neck thru, prefers mainly from a stuctural strength perspective.

I am on my second build which is a bolton, my first was a neck thru. The neck trhu seemed like a much simpler way to build, because you don't have the issue of positioning and fastening the neck to the body. (I am building with no neck angle, that might make a difference in my perspective)
 
Carrots.

The nicest bass I've ever owned was a bolt-on, the next 3 nicest basses I've ever owned were all neck-thru. To me, the neck joint, like pickups, wood composition, etc., is just one ingredient in what makes up a bass. I have a Peavey Cirrus which sounds nothing like a Gibson T-bird which sound nothing like a Spector Euro LX. The tone of a bass is decided by many factors, I've played very punchy neck-thru basses and very smooth bolt-on basses. I'm not saying its irrelevant, but it isn't the biggest factor in what makes a bass good or bad IME.

That said, it is cheaper to make a nice bolt-on than a nice neck-thru.