TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I lol'd. Seriously? Yeah, Marshall has never been stellar at bass, but the VBA400? That's a gnarly amp. And for guitar? Mesa better than a Marshall? Hahahahaha. Now, I'll admit, current production Marshall isn't what it used to be, but Marshall's pre-1974 and current-production Marshall clones such as Metropolis and Germino stomp all for classic rock, and overall, just rock in general.
And in turn you probably couldn't hear yours over a Marshall Major or Hiwatt 400 through 4 15s. This isn't even an argument of Brit vs. American at this point, it's a matter of power and rig size. And saying Lemmy isn't a bass player to try to invalidate the other guys statement? That just comes across as not having any other actual valid statement to make on the subject.
Anyways, as I stated before, British for Guitar+American For Bass (Marshall+Sunn)=The Ultimate combo.

I know a bass player from your way called Chris Williamson who had an old WASP running 4 KT88's it was a stonking good sounding valve amp.I feel left out....
What about New Zealand? Jansen, Gunn, Holden, Alron, Concord, Commodore, Weta......
Speaking of English amps, no-one has mentioned H&H.
Fair enough. I haven't personally used a mesa head for guitar, but every time I have heard one being used it's always been as some metal-y, ridiculous post-80s sound, I have yet to hear one dialed in to cop a Marshall sound. Agreed that the Current-production Marshall cabs are nothing to write home about, but I will say that the old ones, the 60s & 70s ones, were excellent, but I have not AB'd them directly with a Mesa Cab.
I won't get into it about Lemmy. To each his own on this one.
The point I was getting at hear is this isn't a thread about volume, but rather a person prefers British amps or American amps. So disregarding the volume differences between the two, I prefer the Marshalls and Hiwatts, for tone and their other characteristics. If you prefer Mesa for its tone, fair enough, I just don't think we should be basing it on how loud one is compared to the other. However, about the Marshall 810, do you mean the Marshall Model 2034 8x10 that they made in the 60s and 70s, or the current VBA 8x10. Because the old ones were guitar cabs, so of course they can't compete, but the newer one I'd bet could hold against the Mesa. I've used it and was quite astounded by the volume it could put out.
For me, it wasn't about volume until another Marshall fan brought it up, to be honest... and while I'm being honest, I find the position that "well, the old Marshalls were great" to be standing on pretty shaky ground... After all, Mesa has always put out top quality gear...
Anyways, the thread topic was actually:
"Britain's output has the potential to match (and surpass... ) the Stateside offerings."
...which is pretty laughable, given the many outstanding bass amp companies the US has to offer... Sorry, dude - USA wins again, as the poll numbers indicate...
FWIW, it doesn't matter to me what other people prefer - to each their own - but you're kinda moving the goal posts from the OP's thread topic...
- georgestrings
Dude, my main gigging amp as a working guitarist for over 10 years was a '70 Super Lead - there's not alot you can tell me about them, to be honest... You can cop a Marshall tone out of a Mesa head, but a Mesa head can do so much more than that - and Mesa's guitar cabs are of FAR higher quality than Marshall's...
Regarding Lemmy - have you ever listened to him??? - my statement is pretty accurate... No disrespect intended, but there isn't alot of actual bass in Lemmy's bass playing...
Lastly, you would NEED 4 15s of Marshall amplification to compete with my Mesa 810 rig, and even then it wouldn't be much of a mismatch... A Marshall 810 against my Mesa 810 - absolutely no contest whatsoever... Granted, those are a couple of nice heads you mentioned - but by and large, Marshall's offerings for bass are extremely lame - especially when compared to Mesa's... Frankly, I'm amazed than anyone could think otherwise...
Part of my posts on this thread are somewhat "tongue in cheek", but I haven't posted anything I haven't directly experienced, FWIW...
- georgestrings
For me, it wasn't about volume until another Marshall fan brought it up, to be honest... and while I'm being honest, I find the position that "well, the old Marshalls were great" to be standing on pretty shaky ground... After all, Mesa has always put out top quality gear...
Anyways, the thread topic was actually:
"Britain's output has the potential to match (and surpass... ) the Stateside offerings."
...which is pretty laughable, given the many outstanding bass amp companies the US has to offer... Sorry, dude - USA wins again, as the poll numbers indicate...
FWIW, it doesn't matter to me what other people prefer - to each their own - but you're kinda moving the goal posts from the OP's thread topic...
- georgestrings
Marshall's made the Superbass, the Major and the VBA400, among other things. Though I prefer my Mesa D-180, those amps are certainly not lame.
Also, for guitar I really prefer Marshall to Mesa. Also, Mesa's guitar cabs are too big. Their current offerings for bass are good, but honestly none would be my first, second, or even third choice.
Talk about getting your patriotic knickers in a twist
Considering the population of TB is primarily American, and a large slab of that won't have had a huge amount of playing time on British built amps, the poll is hardly a defining one![]()
This poll is about patriotism and nothing more. If the poll were about where your current gear is manufactured, China would be higher up than the USA.
Keep in mind that arguably 98% of the TB population is US based. What would you expect the results to indicate?
To suggest a piece of equipment is better because it's built in a particular country is ignorant.