• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Broughton Audio Super Thread

8ustkv.jpg
 
20240622_180635.jpg

Outdoor jazz set with a singer and guitarist, 100% pizz. Fishman full circle > rfe (10 MΩ) > tuner > di to foh, through to qsc K10 on stage. One spot + daisy chain. Hpf ended up around 80. Lil baby 1-2dB mid boost for pitch definition.

For most of my double bass gigs, the plastic fdeck 2 is a better tool, and I missed mine four times this weekend... But this is an acceptable backup, better for a pedalboard setup, and I have it on good authority that more knobs = moar toanz.
 

Attachments

  • 20240622_180635.jpg
    20240622_180635.jpg
    4.4 MB · Views: 3
Initial thoughts on the Subsonic vs the Octatron:

  1. Tracking is pretty much the same on both. Definitely not disappointing - couldn't go wrong with either.
  2. I still hate the Subsonic's soft button. The Octatron is not. Win there.
  3. For the apples:apples comparison (no Oct 2), they are different but different flavors of the same coin. Clearly both have OC-2 DNA. They both do the glitchy thing when hitting a low E and sustaining it. The Subsonic is slightly more "synthy" and striving to be more of that OC-2 clone whereas the Octatron isn't going to be a 100% emulation.

    The Subsonic seems a bit more open and has some of what the Sub knob on the Octatron does. I can dial in a sound very close to the Subsonic on the Octatron.
  4. With Oct 2 and the controllable sub/EQ, it's a bit more "versatile" than the Subsonic. Again, not better or worse, just different.
  5. Not the biggest fan of where Seamoon put the AC jack. I do wish they had put it on the top.

Right now I don't have a clear cut winner since it's only a few hours in and I just fiddled with it quickly. I'll see after Sunday's rehearsal for a gig.