• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Can I use 250k pots in a Warwick Rockbass Streamer std.?

thespoon

Cynically Optimistic
Mar 8, 2013
538
664
Donut Junction - What a hole!
Hey all:

I tried posting this over on the Warwick forum with zero results.

Hopefully, some of the gurus here can put me some knowledge.

Apologies if this has been covered but a rudimentary search revealed nothing.

The tone pot in my 2013 Warwick Rockbass Streamer Standard 4 died recently, and I was wondering if replacing all of the no-name mini pots with Bourns 250K (which I have in hand) would work?

Currently both volumes are B25K, tone is A25K with a 220nF cap. [Warwick diagrams confirm these are standard from the factory]. Pups are MEC humbuckers.

If so, how would it sound? I should add that the current tone is acceptable. Just wondering what the effect would be without having to solder in the pots. Also, need I be concerned that I might damage the pups somehow?

Just to reiterate: This instrument is a passive bass. V/V/T controls, no battery.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Un Ez
Hey all:

I tried posting this over on the Warwick forum with zero results.

Hopefully, some of the gurus here can put me some knowledge.

Apologies if this has been covered but a rudimentary search revealed nothing.

The tone pot in my 2013 Warwick Rockbass Streamer Standard 4 died recently, and I was wondering if replacing all of the no-name mini pots with Bourns 250K (which I have in hand) would work?

Currently both volumes are B25K, tone is A25K with a 220nF cap. [Warwick diagrams confirm these are standard from the factory]. Pups are MEC humbuckers.

If so, how would it sound? I should add that the current tone is acceptable. Just wondering what the effect would be without having to solder in the pots. Also, need I be concerned that I might damage the pups somehow?

Just to reiterate: This instrument is a passive bass. V/V/T controls, no battery.

Something doesn't sound right, 25k pots wont work on a passive instrument. There is way to little resistance to ground so you would lose alot of output.

Are you sure its a 220nf and not a 22nf capacitor? That would be a .022uf cap which is pretty standard. 220nf would be a .22uf cap which would get really dark when you roll the tone off.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Matt Liebenau
Something doesn't sound right, 25k pots wont work on a passive instrument. There is way to little resistance to ground so you would lose alot of output.

Are you sure its a 220nf and not a 22nf capacitor? That would be a .022uf cap which is pretty standard. 220nf would be a .22uf cap which would get really dark when you roll the tone off.

Well, those imaginative Germans have figured out a way to make the impossible, possible. Sort of like bumblebees. On paper it is impossible for them to fly. Yet, there they are.

Attached is the schematic from Warwick. Notation:"passive electronic for passive pickups".
I have verified those components are in my bass with the Mark I/II Eyeball.
And, yes, other than the tone pot being defective, it plays.

100_1328.JPG
RB126.jpg
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Well, those imaginative Germans have figured out a way to make the impossible, possible. Sort of like bumblebees. On paper it is impossible for them to fly. Yet, there they are.

Attached is the schematic from Warwick. Notation:"passive electronic for passive pickups".
I have verified those components are in my bass with the Mark I/II Eyeball.
And, yes, other than the tone pot being defective, it plays.

View attachment 870184
View attachment 870182

If it works, then a replacement in kind should still work, someone smarter than I am will have to explain it to me. I would be tempted to try it with 250k pots and a .047uf tone cap to see if it opens up some tone and output that you didn't have before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Un Ez
If it works, then a replacement in kind should still work, someone smarter than I am will have to explain it to me. I would be tempted to try it with 250k pots and a .047uf tone cap to see if it opens up some tone and output that you didn't have before.

I am with you, this is the first time I have seen 25ks in a passive instrument.

Output is plenty strong. Louder than my passive Fender PJ with Geezer Butler pups.

Before I got out the solder iron, I wanted to be sure I would not be frying anything.
Thanks for your replies.
 
I am with you, this is the first time I have seen 25ks in a passive instrument.

Output is plenty strong. Louder than my passive Fender PJ with Geezer Butler pups.

Before I got out the solder iron, I wanted to be sure I would not be frying anything.
Thanks for your replies.

Well, you couldn't hurt anything either way. It just may not sound good.
 
25k pots indicates that you have a low impedance signal path. While this is uncommon, it's nothing too special, design-wise.

The use of 250k pots with a low impedance signal will result in on/off switch behavior, with no usable taper. The pots won't have any range, and will just got from 0 to 10 almost instantly.
 
25k pots indicates that you have a low impedance signal path. While this is uncommon, it's nothing too special, design-wise.

The use of 250k pots with a low impedance signal will result in on/off switch behavior, with no usable taper. The pots won't have any range, and will just got from 0 to 10 almost instantly.

I suppose my next question should be: does anyone have a source for high quality 25k pots? I'd like to keep my Gibson speed knobs, so split shaft is preferred. Found lots of solid shafts on Amazon for some reason. Or, tell me how to adapt the solid shafts to my existing knobs.
 
25k pots indicates that you have a low impedance signal path. While this is uncommon, it's nothing too special, design-wise.

The use of 250k pots with a low impedance signal will result in on/off switch behavior, with no usable taper. The pots won't have any range, and will just got from 0 to 10 almost instantly.

Is it the MEK pickups that are low impedance? I haven't ever seen a low impedance passive pickup
 
As an Amazon Associate, TalkBass may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via links on this site.
As an Amazon Associate, TalkBass may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via links on this site.
I am surprised at the minimal feedback loop about a Rockbass.
I'm fairly confident Warwick has sold more than a dozen Rockbasses, asked a question about pots in a $$ and I got nothing.
I am also curious about the truss rod in the newer 2nd gen Rockbasses and did not bother to ask, figured I would get no answers.
Not sure if folks with "real" Warwicks can't be bothered or if all the Rockbass owners are beginners that have no knowledge to share.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Un Ez
I am surprised at the minimal feedback loop about a Rockbass.
I'm fairly confident Warwick has sold more than a dozen Rockbasses, asked a question about pots in a $$ and I got nothing.
I am also curious about the truss rod in the newer 2nd gen Rockbasses and did not bother to ask, figured I would get no answers.
Not sure if folks with "real" Warwicks can't be bothered or if all the Rockbass owners are beginners that have no knowledge to share.

I think its most likely just an issue of it not being a very common bass.