• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Cannot Decide - Which Gibson

Grabber. Way more versatile and not total mud. Unless you're after the mud!

Well, an EB-3 played through a modern amp doesn't have to be "total mud". That's why one lowers the volume of the neck pickup to 6-7 and builds their tone from there.

Having said that, these are two very different instruments in just about every aspect imaginable. Not knowing what OP's sonic goals are or what kind of music is to be played on this "new" Gibby, it's hard to make a recommendation one way or another.
 
Get the EB3! Nice early ones are getting harder and harder to find. The EB3 is capable of so much more than Jack Bruce's muddy tone. Rippers are a decent enough bass, I find them a bit docile sound wise.
I have owned both 60's and 70's EB3s all are great basses. I currently have a '72 EB3 and a '67 EB0, if I had the chance to buy a 60's EB3 I'd grab it!
Oh a Grabber! Great rock bass loud and nasty, my favorite of the G series. I love mine, gimmicky sliding pickup and all. I still say get the EB3, through a good tube rig they sound massive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bobyoung53
Well, an EB-3 played through a modern amp doesn't have to be "total mud". That's why one lowers the volume of the neck pickup to 6-7 and builds their tone from there.

Having said that, these are two very different instruments in just about every aspect imaginable. Not knowing what OP's sonic goals are or what kind of music is to be played on this "new" Gibby, it's hard to make a recommendation one way or another.

You're totally right. IMO though, I standby the Grabber being way more versatile.